Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • Mounds View Planning Commission July 16, 1997 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> Director Sheldon stated that the statement could be inserted into the resolution. <br /> Alexander Amundsen, 7810 Eastwood, stated that the whole project should be scratched <br /> because there are to many buildings in the proposed development. v <br /> _ ` <br /> Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Stevenson to approve Resolution..513-97,, J,$on to approve the <br /> variance on parking ratios for Silver Lake Commons, Pl '"' <: e 4& },'• ended and <br /> •. <br /> acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. ' <br /> 40. <br /> Chair Peterson opened the floor for discussion; e m. ,,n. ? ?. Lx .., ri <br /> Commissioner Obert asked who makes the call� :''.i,A''=; fqis' 'onal parking is required in a <br /> case were a variance has been allowed in the par 3 00.- ts. <br /> Director Sheldon responded by saying it wgithikpend ori `e n agreement <br /> between staff and the property owner could bee ,ed at a staff ; el, and if an agreement <br /> could not be reached the issue would. ;` `� " "he Council. <br /> Commissioner Obert stated th =gin the the o�`. .... <br /> ��.. pad' vt� : �ly claims lack of money as a <br /> • reason for not adhering to •`.. er to ease the *king space requirement <br /> Director Sheldon stated. :' in this: .'icular ' there is a condition on the site plan <br /> that sz s, "The pro•- ., ;3,p x' <br /> er is og,3�� =Rr� � g� old up to an additional 19 parking spaces <br /> which Would meed :. g rati:..: �{;t 3a ..by the zoning code and deemed necessary <br /> based .'',,: ;;s kingpatterns and evidence that parkingneeds cannot be <br /> N,33.;.., },j. <br /> satisfie p. The-,!.,:),.::,:-: ' ,°$caner shall be notified in writing that additional parking <br /> must be `a,.upon su h o shall construct the additional parking within three <br /> months: o j ation L ather conditions. This is an enforcement issue and if <br /> worse3eomes:t wo1 oing to court would be the alternative. <br /> w 1)orothy Bodric �g Sunnyside Road, stated that her opinion was that the <br /> tw; development wouldbe a big improvement and she was in favor of the development. <br /> rem aq <br /> , ,r . Chair Peteri. *called for a vote on the motion. <br /> 1 Z : 4 ayes, 1 nay(Obert) <br /> Commissioner Obert stated his reason for dissent as being his opposition of the total <br /> project and to vote in favor of the variance or planning did not make sense. Obert said he <br /> felt the City staff has been pushed and cornered into a project that is bad for the City. <br /> 111 <br /> 5 <br />