09-03-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission August 6, 1997 4) Regular Meeting Page 2 4. Planning Case No. 490-97 7720-7730 Silver Lake Road 46>� Applicants: Glenn and Ursula Karlen .:.., 40" .t.a Minor subdivision to two lots for existing duplex. `� e"„,`- The applicants, Glenn and Ursula Karlen, were pry"' lir 4.4,.:...:‘..z.,, .< r `x r„ h.k � :.: :'' Planning Associate Ericson gave the Commission: ' f v ers a brief overvc ,ot e applicant's request as follows: This minor subdivi ` s two lots, one with 6,956 qfrontage " z; ''h a other with 8,734 square square feet with 35 feet of on Silver Lal<��'$~��.�� ;��;r feet and 55 feet wide at the street. Both lots arbove 8 t;a. ¢: e. • lot size of 6,250 square feet for zero lot line developments. _.,1,,..are exist';;. `N, �t drainage and utility easements around the perimeter of the .$ ';b he appli >$`3 propose an additional five feet of easement in the front and: 'ftp:.: n feet•col) as well as a five foot utility easement where the utilities• e buried nt>`��: $e 'of the lot. 4,9 lie Planning Associate EricsogitAted thaqie minim4 square footage for total lot area • required by code is 12,500 Even. ugh thi%. n home was built before the current regulations covering zerht-line deae,`pment. rere implemented, the property exceeds the minimum lot areaer. cerement w` p::?. total square feet for both parcels. Th5appilFants ha. ;i:`' ,ed a Ce.1,:,!';11:.'.:,.\` Survey for the subject property located at 704144,730 S ':;.i '..oad. There would be no physical changes associated with this"' bdivisioii `.'g}?. allowing for either side to be purchased as an owner- 'iii,iia Play iii.ehUg A`kitact icson�'old the Commission it is the staffs recommendation that the ° ng 'oze -'.-y$,�z �; ° eso u ion •o. .-a-, . reso u ion recommensin. approv. F.:4.1;f a minor subdivision t'or Glenn and Ursula Karlen of 7720/7730 Silver Lake Road, with stipulations. 2}>; d Planning As Ani o fate Ericson stated that there had been changes made to Resolution No. >;ENr 2 6-97 aptilecplained the changes as follows: lipitaiRW %.4:24tow. No. 2 under the stipulations, page 2, is that the common wall dividing the two units, it shall conform to all required building and fire code specifications, and that the City's building inspector inspect the wall prior to City Council action. If it is deemed that there are code violations the applicant will be responsible for making all improvements necessary prior to recording the Resolution and the Certificate of • Survey.