Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 530-97 • <br /> CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br /> COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR A 33-FOOT DRIVEWAY <br /> CURB CUT AT 8419 SPRING LAKE ROAD; PLANNING CASE NO. 503-97 <br /> WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of <br /> Steve and Laura Lattrez, residing at 8419 Spring Lake Road; and, <br /> WHEREAS, this property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential District and is legally <br /> described as: <br /> That part of Lot 38 described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of <br /> said Lot 38, thence southerly along the west line of said Lot 38 a distance of 375 <br /> feet to the point of beginning, thence easterly along a line parallel to the north line <br /> of said Lot 38 a distance of 211 feet; thence southerly along a line parallel to the <br /> west line of said Lot 38 to the south line of said Lot 38; thence westerly along the <br /> southerly line of said Lot 38 a distance of 211 feet to the west line of said Lot 38; <br /> thence northerly along the west line of said Lot 38 to the point of beginning; <br /> Auditor's Subdivision No. 89;Ramsey County, State of Minnesota <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents associated <br /> with this request: <br /> 1. Planning Application <br /> 2. Zoning Map <br /> 3. Site Plan <br /> 4. Letter from Applicant <br /> 5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 530-97 <br /> WHEREAS, the applicants request the variance to allow for a 33-foot driveway curb cut, <br /> which is eleven feet wider than what is allowed in Section 1121.09, Subd. 5 of the Mounds View <br /> Municipal Code; and, <br /> WHEREAS, the driveway expansion for which the variance has been requested has <br /> already been completed; and, <br /> WHEREAS, Asphalt Driveway Company, the contractor that performed the work, failed <br /> to obtain a building permit prior to the driveway installation; and, <br /> WHEREAS, there are no extraordinary or exceptional circumstances that apply to this • <br /> property that would justify the granting of this variance request; and, <br />