Laserfiche WebLink
• Mounds View Planning Commission September 3, 1997 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> instead of the originally planned 16. The complete renovation of the Red Oak apartments <br /> is still included in the revised development plan. All dimensional requirements, drainage <br /> and ponding, access and parking, landscaping and easement issues have bee addressed by <br /> the applicant. He added that there are some clarifications that nee .,to be' ade in regards <br /> to the originally planned chain-link fence. Consideration should #i` iven to entering <br /> into an easement with the neighboring property to al >for a pOoltotg.ccess to <br /> Eastwood Road at the northeast corner of the pro ``y. lo « '><� <br /> Associate Ericson addressed the Minor Subdivi ,statins a park de `<44' v<V''ti <br /> requirement will need to be met. He stated the e nrequirements and` : es�to the <br /> 7•'1ti�it� <br /> survey would have to have proper documentation ! ues needing to be resolved by <br /> MSP Real Estate: the new Red Oak Apartment ' '' <br /> . a �� tached office and recreation <br /> area cross the lot line between the apartments and'propi kittrthe townhome <br /> dwellings, and the driveway for the apartmegts would need` _ located to the <br /> townhomes lot, and a shared access drivewayent recoi*SjViih the county. <br /> Associate Ericson stated that Sta ...:y :>.:> ,.. <br /> '%s`recomeri �a�:toPlanning Commission <br /> approve Resolution 528-97, a resolution remmerikproval of a development review <br /> • :..;:;::...a <br /> request for MSP Real Estate�� vided tl �'City En €#eer has approved the drainage plan, <br /> subject to stipulations. `'''`";�•:<::� <br /> ;Altar .„Air <br /> Mir <br /> Associate Ericson state€ hat Staf n:im ding that the PlanningCommission <br /> app esoluti € : , a resof c mmendin approval of a minor subdivision <br /> ::.n::.:;:::.•.:• g PP <br /> r !ISP Rat <to combine the two vacant arcels south of the apartments <br /> into ` :.' rovided< lresolved the two issues described above, subject to <br /> p <br /> sti ulaton .. { <br /> Mar <br /> Mi o P nkei € nt oIMSP Real Estate, stated the development review before the <br /> »`Commission is to'a €ve the development review based on the fact that all code and <br /> < ordinances issuesave been met. <br /> ............ <br /> :.> ne CommissioStevenson asked if there was an income level change based on a reduction <br /> om 16,;ta Tome units to 10, how man of the units will <br /> y be of the subsidized type. He <br /> <'< al < .d'`the applicant to address, for the a public, the approximate rise in the rent that <br /> <'impat t'take place because of the upgrade planned for the Red Oak Apartments. <br /> Mr. Pinkerton stated that the townhomes will rent for$650-$750 with the tenant paying <br /> their own utilities. The apartment rates will go up to $520 for a one-bedroom and $590 <br /> 111 for two-bedroom apartments. He added that the number of subsidized units is still ten, as <br /> it was in the original development. <br />