10-01-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• Mounds View Planning Commission September 17, 1997 Special Meeting Page 3 It was stated as a unanimous feeling by the Commission that the contractor, having done business in the City of Mounds View in the past, knew that a permit was required. Commissioner Brasaemle stated his concern with setting a precedent by allowing an 11- foot variance over the allowable 22 feet. `' < < Motion/second: Brasaemle/Obert to approve Planning Ccnunission Res ' :.-97, "A resolution denying the variance request of Steve and Lau 'Lattrez to< 1low}f ' »mot wide:'' curb cut, 11 feet more than the maximum allowed by C4` VoiagammEi:v Ms. Lattrez asked how much time the contracto`.",.baiarepove the section of driveway in question. Associate Ericson stated that the City would:n fy the con for m writing that the variance request was denied and that they>Elriveway Company] are responsible for removingthe work bythe sti ulat. date�< <l€1` `'.:> P .. Chair Peterson asked for a vote n the m.ption. Motion carried: 5 ayes, 1 nay (Stntn) > '' Commissioner Stey4a.miiit"stated tttaaVotatagainst the resolution on the grounds that it i re work fectioggity to undo undoiiimglim—g that has been done. ChAttaggersAp toldMa.magagg,that she had the right of appeal to the CityCouncil if she g pp so desi ' Nair • 6. INEEMMO Planng Case No. 504 € `<'' 2672645 Highway 10:>> ' lcant: MSP Real estate z .Subdivision request for Silver Lake Commons to combine two vacant lots into one onto #:'t „towrh =styled dwellings would be constructed. The applicant, MSP Real Estate, was present. Associate Ericson briefly reviewed for the Commission the background on the above • request. He stated that the minor subdivision process, as defined in Section 1201.03 and described in Chapter 1202 of the City Code is required in this situation to combine the