Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission November 19, 1997 • <br /> Special Meeting Page 2 <br /> 4. & 5. <br /> Planning Case Nos. 501-97 and 502-97 <br /> Southeast corner of Highway 10 and Silver Lake Road <br /> Applicant: Silverview Estates, Inc. <br /> Consideration of Resolution No. 526-97 regarding a Prelimingy Plat f w the tverview Estates" <br /> Planned Unit Development reorganizing eight parcels into f rparcelg .Oon ideration of <br /> Resolution No. 515-97 regarding a Development Review;; lie prop9014181ivi Estates':<> ' <br /> Planned Unit Development consisting of a Holiday Gas *.tion, Car; ? ash an C mve.ence::;: /` <br /> Store; a two-story office building and a one-story officeMilding,, d an 82-uniiiWatifEntial <br /> building. <br /> Thea applicant Silverview Estates Inc. was resent. }�'� `• l `}"'` <br /> For discussionu oses Planner Peters:: ' ommission t <eombine agenda item <br /> P rP g <br /> Nos. 4 and 5 and then divide the two:ies''attp :;they arg>considered for vote. <br /> The request was granted by the anmissiOr •' <br /> Planner Peters gave his presentation,a follows: <br /> Ordinance No. 599 aEring the Planned;> ' Development rezoning was approved May <br /> 27..:> , At an, ?, 1997 PP �' ommission meeting it was determined that <br /> there >:several : t.;needed to`be resolved before the Planning Commission <br /> couldcOdfailia*Atiy.actiontilhiliest to approve the development plan. Additionally, the <br /> developmentdevelORWRiim had beenawa t mg preliminary approval from MN/DOT for the <br /> propomiiiitaglagtong TROpyas identified on the plat. On October 9, 1997, MN/DOT <br /> gran€ `prelfr .roval for the requested curb cuts, and as a result of the approval <br /> ::the applicant has ' i toward completion of the submittal package for consideration <br /> €vby the Planning Cession. <br /> <`< Planner Petersntinued with the presentation of the Development Review: <br /> Jar The print original buildingfoot has changed form the allowable maximum <br /> g <br /> h <br /> tot e <br /> will require an amendment <br /> 1 e <br /> 0 Thismodification <br /> 0 80 <br /> 0 <br /> f 84 00 to 115 <br /> q <br /> was approvedon <br /> PUD resolution that May27, 1997. This will be done <br /> ...•.... <br /> prior to City Council action. <br /> 2. The amounts and percentages of pervious and impervious surfaces shown <br /> on the site plans for each of the lots within the PUD are inaccurate. The . <br />