Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission November 19, 1997 <br /> Special Meeting Page 4 <br /> 7. The Rice Creek Watershed District approved the required permit on <br /> October 22, 1997. <br /> 8. The City Engineer has identified three issues that Aig nee it be addressed <br /> before approving the development. These were:+`'`•e' <br /> : follows: <br /> a. Lack of distance between thilidet and outlet # :.TURP pond < <br /> .400" Naidak, <br /> on Lot 3. :. <br /> b. Ensure that the culverts u#� S:tr the Paul WateNVi `f <br /> way function properly. {" st'' <br /> c. Ensure that emergency oveiONAIN the NURP pond on lot 4 is <br /> directed away from the une 'gi ages and toward the street. <br /> These issues are addressed as.> ditions of' p3 ?. Q Planning <br /> Commission Resolution N '> ? <br /> ASOMMEiLiC <br /> 9. The light fixture types missina '# a <br /> g t'proposal were addressed <br /> and the applicant:: esented mples t 'fixtures for the Commission's <br /> review. ``' • <br /> ARP <br /> Planner Peters stated thatMere are cerns abut off-site glare. The developer of the <br /> Holiday StationstoretkasiiWen asked'to l: `ways in which this glare could be reduced. <br /> N `` tometric;; twere made` 4litElle for the Commission to review. This <br /> a b < 3ows an aper xi to 50 percent reduction in glare with the use of a baffle <br /> 111111111116, <br /> sys ems_. <br /> . elo er a tiessed the Commission and said that the glare could be <br /> Chuck;:: . it �g �!, p 3:.,_ <br /> reduced by'ti e bgb baf e"tystem and presented this baffle system to the Commission <br /> "'their review <br /> Planner Peters stgted.that it is SRF's recommendation to use the baffle system and <br /> consider a threeionth review that is based on the level of complaints that are made by <br /> the area resid #ts to the glare of the lights and the baffle system. <br /> 5.4 <br /> "00and reminded the Commission that a <br /> well-lit store is a safer store. <br /> Planner Peters continued: <br /> 10. Snow storage areas not identified on the original plan have been identified. <br /> One problem still existing is the snow storage for Lot 4 is shown within the • <br />