My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-18-1998
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
02-18-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 6:13:43 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 6:13:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/18/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
View Mounds Planning Commission February 4, 1998 <br /> ill e <br /> Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> This is the reason that the Comprehensive Plan would have to be amended for the <br /> Walgreen Development. <br /> The Comprehensive Plan issues are: .„ <br /> 1. What kind of buffer is the developer providin >r n `'`" <br /> 2. Traffic impact, a 40 percent increase in tra ; ' <br /> ;s <br /> 3. Suitability for residential development. h`. % " <br /> 4. The impac on the City's tax base. <br /> 5. Green space .-: "°`4 y <br /> The rezoning issues are: ;; ., <br /> 1. The relationship to the Comprehensi . �.}�an ,. .." ":gi, <br /> 2. Surrounding developments, what <br /> r ,,.,.. ` `` : <br /> 3. Demonstrated need for the dezvopmer t 3:•S <br /> 4. Grading issues / , <br /> 5. Traffic impact, closing ofFEastwoo..0.Road",y„ -- <br /> Ill6. Crime impact �'� <br /> Commissioner Johnsto O40,4 <br /> qdi <br /> ed Mr.- ngh. :AP <br /> f there was anyverification to back <br /> up <br /> the statement made b: .. ""&izen tha `$ s' would fall in value by 15 percent if the <br /> W'. project: f =sough. . .. ' _ham declined to comment. <br /> Ga.. •. fie: ems.7730 0'i 0d Drive, stated that she had a realtor appraise her property. <br /> The rea ;,why" W£..S." . <br /> t d s. Keye 1 p property would decrease in value by 10 - 15 percent if <br /> the .<:a . - <br /> Wal . $. 0. :.3 went th - h. <br /> Ir <br /> 40- 41We:it <br /> k, . rren Johnson W. :`,4*µ y , ccnwood Driv-asked-the Commission who would be <br /> . responsible for therase in value of his property if the Walgreen project is approved. <br /> V< , r He asked the Cofission to research this question and have some type of answer <br /> At <br /> :,':" available at the next meeting that involved the project. <br /> R?S`.. <br /> ",,NA:' <br /> commissioner Obert suggested that the City use an independent real estate appraiser to <br /> ::.properties in question. <br /> Associate Ericson stated that an independent appraiser was available for the City's use <br /> and the City Attorney could be called in to answer questions of valuation impact that the <br /> Walgreen project might have. <br /> 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.