My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-1995
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Packets
>
1994-1999
>
1995
>
02-23-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2018 6:32:01 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 6:34:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/23/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SIGN ORDINANCE ISSUE • <br /> General Comments: <br /> 4 City is too restrictive for signage - portable be checked. <br /> 4 Bad temporary sign ordinance. <br /> 4 sign ordinance <br /> 4 lack of signage on 10 <br /> 4 Sign ordinance is bad. <br /> 34 companies completed the Mounds View Supplement whereby a question was asked <br /> with regards to priority of project. 46 percent felt that the City should place the <br /> revision of the sign ordinance on a high priority. <br /> Under the retail and professional services supplements, a question was asked with regards <br /> to the adequacy of current sign. Out of 48 that answered the question, 33% were not <br /> satisfied with their current sign. Some of the reasons are as follows: <br /> 4 Would like to stand out more with a lit sign. <br /> 4 Current Sign is outdated. <br /> 4 Like a sign closer to the road. • <br /> 4 Larger than 2 square feet. <br /> 4 A larger reader board. <br /> 4 Would like a directional sign on Highway 10 because we are tourist related. <br /> 4 Bigger sign. <br /> -4 Would like larger free standing sign greater than 15 feet. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.