My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-15-1998
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
04-15-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 6:47:06 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 6:45:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/15/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission April 15, 1998 <br /> Special Meeting Page 12 <br /> development. The support for keeping commercial development on Highway 10 is <br /> overwhelming and the buffering issues for this development are undecided. <br /> Commissioner Brasaemle made a statement in explanation of his change i•49.ew for the <br /> project. He stated the fact that the developer has settled with fou s t of ix adjacent <br /> property owners and the developer's willingness to abi•e by a Hite P'cision, one way <br /> or another, on the Highway 10 access. <br /> Motion/Second: Obert/Peterson to approve Resolution 538-98, x ,olu end .. <br /> the City Council approve Ordinance 614,an Ordinance €$ _ ovine w rezoning" $t! g =, z <br /> located at 2625 Highway 10 and 7715 -7761 Eastwood Y <°tea R-3,Medium ` , . <br /> Residential, and R-1, Single-Family Residential,to B-2, 611013',•;;C),`4:) siness District;Planning Case <br /> No. 507-97. <br /> Ayes -4 • <br /> _ <br /> The motion carried. <br /> Mr.Pinkerton asked the Comm' on howf€ was ;c4i `? et compensated for having an <br /> 18' wall with high-intensity built b �"�'nd his t• ome development. He said he <br /> i <br /> felt like the rug was being t out fry - under h :evelopment half way through its <br /> completion. <br /> < <br /> Co sioner Ob :ked the ,i6 their participation in the process. <br /> tr <br /> 41,/t.k: $ essed e#.0t•intment in the fact the Planning Commission, while <br /> righ• 17:30, 740ds ove "'11,:;t4;4.Airkil., to treat the developers fairly. I find that it was <br /> extremeL: ' :te thaCkifills" of proposals were not available two weeks ago, and <br /> basi " a'' siden <br /> in a position where they got caught off guard." <br /> A te -minute recess wa; , B 'at 8:40 p.m. <br /> :..ieL on the record at ' 0 p.m. <br /> Pan'; ; e No 514-98 <br /> 8400 oral Sea Street <br /> Applicant: Bridges Leasing Company,LLC <br /> Consideration of Resolution No 542-98 Approving the Development Review for Completion of <br /> the 2nd Phase of Bridges Technology Building Project <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.