Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Mounds View Planning Commission April 1, 1998 Ak <br /> Regular Meeting Page 2 lir <br /> 4. Approval of Minutes: March 4, 1998 (Regular) <br /> Motion/Second: Stevenson/Peterson to approve the March 4, 1998 regular meeting minutes as <br /> amended. <br /> Ayes - 5 Nays- 0 `� <br /> 5. '' <br /> , <br /> PlanningCase No. 507-97 • u <br /> 2625 Highway 10, 7715-7761 Eastwood Road y °" '_'`y' `>, <br /> Applicant: TOLD Development Company ``x <br /> Discussion Regarding Walgreen Development Request, . <' 3".::. i: - Plan Amendment, and <br /> Rezoning. ' Mh£ •3,; <br /> Ban' y :^: `ed b °aY s ert Cunningham, was <br /> The applicant, TOLD Development 9,. i y <br /> present.::>,_.,., > <br /> .,- <br /> Associate Ericson made his, entatio+.:":s follow-. <br /> ✓ice, .ii3ar' .. IP <br /> s>_ <br /> .a „,, <br /> 2, r3ZM <br /> „. <br /> TOLD Development, on $ alf of ,: ,4 een's requesting a Comprehensive Plan <br /> Ame,•..ment and rez 3 f reside . 4 , es to allow for the construction of a <br /> W. :` -3 store .> g east co ”',';‘,Alt-:.: way 10 and County Road I. The meeting <br /> 4:.: 1+ cusses .x' 0 '$ -vious P anning Commission meetings, public hearings and <br /> comm t ,.:.eetings i ,xr.t 7 .} •n with the Comprehensive Plan Update process. The <br /> new in v: ' o : at the ;t:>_.._ g-.° as made available as follows: <br /> 1.%." Ameri '. '$.;'. g Association (APA) information, which was not attached <br /> because' sio : ddress the issue of how the Walgreens <br /> , , property values. <br /> dk ,I ' <br /> : , <br /> adjacent pts , <br /> 2.ir Discuss; with the City Attorney regarding who is responsible for the decline in <br /> prop s=`;> values, if any, when a commercial development comes into a residential <br /> a �4 A. The City Attorney advised: Neither the City nor the developer, in general, <br /> can be held liable for any real or perceived reduction in property value. <br /> There is a certain degree of risk that goes with properties that abut vacant <br /> land, or that is in close proximity to major transportation arteries or major <br /> commercial centers. In the event a mistake or oversight is made during the fib <br /> project review or construction, according to Minnesota Statutes, a city, its <br />