04-15-1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Resolution No. 544-98 April 15, 1998 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission fmds that this proposal meets the purpose and intent of Planned Unit Developments as stated in Section 1120.01 of the Mounds View Municipal Code in that the proposal has planned the overall development of this property and included an appropriate mix of uses which compliment each other, and will add to the vitality of the City Center. Requirements have been included to insure high quality architectural design and coordinated signage. The substantial wetland on the property will be preserved, and consideration will be given to preserving the tree cover on this parcel outside of development areas wherever possible. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission fords that this proposal meets the general requirements and standards for Planned Unit Developments (Section 1120.02) through the stipulations established in Exhibit 1 to this resolution. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission fmds that this proposal meets the special requirements and standards for commercial PUDs (Section 1120.03 Subd. 2) as follows: Required Provided Minimum Project Size 5 acres 26.03 acres Minimum Street Frontage 200 feet 1690 feetID Minimum Property Width 200 feet 1280 feet WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the proposed PUD development stage plan is generally consistent with the approved PUD general concept plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found that the proposed PUD development stage plan meets the review and evaluation criteria found in 1120.04, Subdivision 3f.of the Mounds View Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve a PUD development stage plan dated 3-6-98, for the O'Neil property, 2430 Highway 10, and as described in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and subject to the following stipulations: 1. That the landscape plan should be amended to incorporate the changes suggested by the City Forester in his 3-31-98 memorandum. A final landscape plan should be submitted for approval by the City Forester. 2. That the site plan be amended to incorporate the changes suggested by SEH in the memorandum dated 3-31-98 and the comments from the Fire Marshal. The site plan submitted for PUD final plan approval should include the changes. 3. The drainage/utilities plan should be amended to eliminate the City storm sewer system • on the property as per the memorandum from Rocky Keehn dated 4-13-98. The