Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br /> 471-97: O'Neil Property111 <br /> March 8, 1997 <br /> Page 6 <br /> includes a number of policies regarding buffering between land uses. These have been <br /> included in Appendices 1 and 2. <br /> 2. Inconsistency between Comp Plan and Zoning: The designation for approximately 17 <br /> acres of the O'Neil property is inconsistent with the zoning in terms of use (commercial <br /> versus residential). According to State law, zoning takes precedence over comprehensive <br /> plan designations. Unless the zoning is changed from commercial to residential, the most <br /> likely use of the 17 acres is commercial. It is to be expected that the property owner <br /> would resist action to change the zoning from commercial to residential. <br /> 3. Suitability for Single Family Residential: There is some question whether it is appropriate <br /> to put single family residential adjacent to Highway 10. If a single family residential <br /> development were built, it is likely that it would be"walled off" from the highway tocreate <br /> a liveable environment. The result would be blank face or dead spot in the middle of the <br /> "community center" district and along the highway. <br /> 4. Value as Commercial Property: The O'Neil parcel is prime commercial property with its <br /> frontage along the Highway 10, given the premium placed on visibility by high volumes of <br /> traffic by commercial uses, and the availability of access from an arterial highway and the <br /> I-35 corridor. The market for neighborhood or community retail commercial is weak, as <br /> evidenced by the vacancies in the Mounds View Square Shopping Center and Silver View <br /> Plaza and as reported in a recent market study by Towle Real Estate for the Highway 10 <br /> corridor in Mounds View. This application indicates that there is market interest in the <br /> property for specialty commercial development. <br /> 5. Effect on City's Tax Base: <br /> • If the property were developed as single family residential, it would cost the City <br /> more in services than it will generate in revenue. If it were developed as <br /> commercial it would generate more revenue than it will cost in services. <br /> • When looking at the overall picture, the City has a very limited amount of land in <br /> commercial zoning or commercial uses (3.9% in 1990), and an extensive amount <br /> of land in single family residential (45.1% in 1990). One possible goal of land use <br /> planning is to balance the types of land uses to create a sustainable economy and a <br /> reasonable level of taxes for services. Commercial uses pay more property taxes <br /> than does single family residential development. Commercial uses which attract <br /> customers from a wider area than the City's boundaries import dollars, and may <br /> create additional spending at other Mounds View businesses such as restaurants. <br /> They may prompt additional commercial development which also adds to the tax <br /> base. <br />