My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-19-1998
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
08-19-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 7:31:47 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 7:30:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/19/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Bellamy CUP Request <br /> 2185 Pinewood Drive <br /> August 19, 1998 <br /> Page 2 • <br /> Dimensional Requirements: <br /> Required Provided Met/Not Met <br /> Garage Setbacks (Front) 70 feet 80 feet Met <br /> (Side) 5 feet 13 feet Met <br /> (Rear) 5 feet 38 feet Met <br /> Percent of Rear Yard* < 25% 15% Met <br /> Garage Width s 35 feet 22 feet Met <br /> Area of all Accessory Buildings: s 1,264 Sq. ft. 1,008 Sq. ft. Met <br /> Analysis: <br /> At past Planning Commission and City Council meetings, the issue of building a proportional <br /> relationship requirement between a house and garage has been discussed. Those discussions led <br /> to the adopting of Ordinance 620, which in this case, would not impact the applicant's request. <br /> While the proposed garage is significantly larger than the house (1,008 sf for the garage compared <br /> to only 682 for the house), under either set of guidelines, a CUP would be required. The rear <br /> yard is large enough to meet the 20% rear yard coverage limitation. The question remains, • <br /> however, "is the proposed garage too large for he site and the home?" To balance this concern, <br /> the advantages of such a garage, such as creating adequate storage space for the resident's <br /> vehicles and yard appliances, need to be considered. Because of privacy fencing used by the <br /> applicant and the adjoining neighbor, the full effect of the garage would be shielded from either <br /> street view. As presented, the proposal meets all of the criteria imposed by the Code, as <br /> addressed in the dimensional requirements above. Staff feels, in this instance, that the benefits of <br /> such a garage may outweigh any disadvantages. <br /> The driveway to the current garage is about 80 feet long and unpaved. The applicant has shown <br /> on the "proposed" site plan to be improving the driveway with concrete. If this CUP request is <br /> recommended for approval, one requirement shall be that the driveway be improved with a <br /> permanent surface within three months of taking out the building permit for the garage. An <br /> additional requirement imposed by approving this CUP would be to further screen the proposed <br /> garage by means of erecting a privacy fence parallel to Pinewood Drive between the garage and <br /> the property line to the west. <br /> Adverse Effects <br /> Of the criteria listed in Section 1125.01, Sub. 3 for granting conditional use permits, the proposal <br /> appears to satisfy the requirements with the possible exception of two: • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.