My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-02-1998
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
09-02-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 7:34:01 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 7:33:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/2/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Resolution 554-98 <br /> September 2, 1998 <br /> • Page 2 <br /> 2. The Geographical Area Involved <br /> 4. The Character of the Surrounding Area <br /> The subject parcel is of the same size or larger than most of the lots within a two block radius. The <br /> building footprint diagram clearly shows that in this area of the City, there already appears to be <br /> garages as large as what is proposed at 2185 Pinewood Drive,some of which larger than their <br /> principal structures, again as would be the case at 2185 Pinewood Drive. <br /> 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. <br /> There is no reason to believe that a 1,008 square-foot garage would negatively impact the <br /> property values of the subject property or those adjacent to it. The case could be made that <br /> with ample storage space within the garage,there would be fewer vehicles parked outside and <br /> less clutter about the property. This type of transformation could result in a positive effect to <br /> the neighboring properties. <br /> 5. The demonstrated need for such a use. <br /> The applicant has multiple vehicles and owns and operates a race car as a hobby, and has a car hauler <br /> upon which to transport the vehicle. The car hauler does not currently fit into the existing garage, and <br /> • thus is kept outside in full view of the neighborhood and vehicles passing by on County Road I. <br /> Constructing the garage as proposed would allow the car hauler and the race car to be stored inside. <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings regarding the criteria <br /> for approval of a conditional use permit, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 3.b.: <br /> (1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks,schools, streets and other public <br /> facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. <br /> (7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. <br /> (8) Adequate utilities, access roads,drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be <br /> provided. <br /> The construction of an oversized garage will not create a greater impact on existing public facilities or <br /> services, on utilities or access roads,nor will it create an increase in traffic on adjacent streets. The <br /> increase in runoff from the larger structure is not significant and will not affect the drainage system. <br /> (2) The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent <br /> residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and <br /> there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. <br /> (3) The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon <br /> adjacent residential properties. <br /> The placement of the garage would be such that the bulk of the structure would be hidden from street <br /> • view and shielded by mature trees in front and privacy fences on either side. This will provide <br /> adequate screening, and will preserve the residential character of the neighborhood. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.