Laserfiche WebLink
• Planning Commission Resolution 560-98 <br /> September 2, 1998 <br /> • Page 2 <br /> WHEREAS, the literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the <br /> applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district in that the parking <br /> is required to be installed in accordance with the development agreement and that the City Code <br /> does allow for joint parking and off-site parking arrangements; and, <br /> WHEREAS, special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the <br /> applicant in that the site plans were drafted by outside consultants, upon whose expertise and <br /> abilities the applicant and City entrusted; and, <br /> WHEREAS, granting the variance requested would not confer on the applicant a special <br /> privilege that is denied by this Title to owners or other lands, structures or buildings in the same <br /> district in that other properties within the City have combined parking lots and joint parking <br /> arrangements; and, <br /> WHEREAS, the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the <br /> hardship, in that the minimum required width for two aisles of parking with an access drive in <br /> between is sixty feet, which is what was shown on the original development plans. The variance <br /> requested will allow for the sixty feet to be installed according to the plans approved by the City <br /> Council; and, <br /> • WHEREAS, the variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title <br /> or to other properties in the same zone in that both circulation and safety between and within the <br /> two properties would improve while parking can be sufficiently expanded to meet the <br /> requirements as outlined by the City Code; and, <br /> WHEREAS, the variance would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br /> property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire <br /> or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the <br /> neighborhood in that the joint parking and access would improve congestion, improve public <br /> safety and improve parking on both sites. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mounds View Planning Commission <br /> acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals approves the variance request of Daniel Hall and <br /> Charles Herbst, to allow a zero-foot setback for a joint use parking lot between the Mermaid, <br /> located at 2200 Highway 10, and Perkins, located at 2214 Highway 10. <br /> Adopted this 16th day of September, 1998 <br /> Jerry Peterson, Chairman <br /> ATTEST <br /> Rick Jopke, Community Development Director <br /> SEAL <br />