My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-16-1998
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
09-16-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 7:40:33 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 7:39:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/16/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- 6 OF <br /> • Ill©UDS <br /> Phone: (612) 717-4000 <br /> "• gE W Fax: (612) 784-3462 <br /> '0r <br /> ers• Partne<s- <br /> July 28, 1998 <br /> Mike Tobias <br /> 8111 Eastwood Road <br /> Mounds View,MN 55112 <br /> RE: Permit#98095 Asphalt Driveway Replacement <br /> • Dear Mr. Tobias: <br /> You recently obtained a permit for replacing the driveway on your property. During the permit <br /> review process you were informed that the City code restricts the number of curb cuts allowing <br /> street access to residential properties to only one access. You questioned and objected to this <br /> requirement based upon the fact that the driveway had existed for some time with access to both <br /> Eastwood Road and Sherwood Road. You were told that the driveway constituted a <br /> nonconforming condition and the status of the nonconforming condition could remain as long as <br /> the driveway be maintained in its existing state. <br /> However, because the existing asphalt was removed and the nonconforming condition was abated <br /> the ability to maintain the nonconforming status was no longer possible. The permit was issued <br /> under the condition.that the access to Sherwood Road would not be reinstalled. <br /> A subsequent inspection of the property has revealed that both previously existing accesses have <br /> been reinstalled. This situation creates a nonconforming condition that, because of the removal of <br /> the previous nonconforming condition, is a violation of Municipal Code. <br /> Your choices at this time, are 1) remove the portion of asphalt that connects the street to the <br /> property line that creates one of the accesses or 2)apply for and receive a variance that will allow <br /> you to continue the nonconforming condition. I am enclosing an application for you to use to <br /> • request a variance if you should choose to. The variance process is handled by Planning Associate <br /> Jim Ericson. He can be reached at 717-4022. <br /> J crrrf0 wir- 7TT <br /> `�• aq� i-'ic, wav 10 • Mounts ViPry r•�1�, ,''� SS"'�- <br /> :_._..� ^^ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.