My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-16-1998
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
09-16-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 7:40:33 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 7:39:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/16/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 • <br /> August 19, 1998 <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Brasaemle/Stevenson to approve the July 1, 1998 Planning Commission <br /> regular meeting minutes as corrected. <br /> Ayes- 6 Nays- 0 • <br /> ` <br /> Motion carried <br /> • Hsre, 2„ <br /> ff , <br /> 5. <br /> 2a: <br /> Planning Case No. 531-98 <br /> 2185 Pinewood Drive <br /> Consideration of Resolution No. 554-98, a Resolution ' a _ • pproval of a Conditional <br /> Use Permit for and Oversized Accessory Building. <br /> Applicant: Tammy Bellamy <br /> The applicant, Tammy Bellamy, was pres-J P. <br /> Associate Ericson gave his report . 3',Vaws: „2. • <br /> Currently there is a small, one • a-half � resid, &- and a detached single-car garage on <br /> the corner lo located at 21 ' ood D cy Street. The applicant was requesting <br /> perinissio,,t10,(1•4 struct • are foo',4 ' garage, 24 feet wide by 42 feet deep, to be <br /> located e the - feet from the west property line. The garage would be set <br /> back further ,•pertufil,00 se. The applicant had requested a similar CUP in 1997, <br /> but chose to - reque _ ion could be taken by the City Council. <br /> At past Pl. ng oii 'ssio ' •,d City Council meetings, the issue of building a proportional <br /> relatio 'p requirement\ $.. . house and garage had been discussed. Those discussions led <br /> to th- doption of Ordin• g �„� I, which in this case, would not impact the applicant's request <br /> ,2 ,,. <br /> be e Ordinance 620 "Lles into effect September 4, 1998. <br /> f ill: <br /> R Jr4,gad determines,,Jia rear yard is large enough to satisfy the 20 percent rear yard coverage <br /> :.t ,; The e :'=""ion then became: "Is the proposed garage too large for the site and the <br /> e this concern the following uses were listed for the garage: <br /> 1. Create adequate storage space for the resident's vehicles and yard appliances <br /> 2. Create storage space for resident's car hauler <br /> The use of privacy fencing by the Bellamys and their adjoining neighbor will screen the garage • <br /> from view at the street. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.