My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-16-1998
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
09-16-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 7:40:33 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 7:39:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/16/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Mounds View Planning Commission September 2, 1998 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> White stated the structure did not have footings. <br /> Brooks asked if a gravel walkway would work. <br /> Mrs. White told the Commission a gravel walkway w uld m . r to move <br /> snowblowers, etc., and the gravel would be sloppe. olita ing a sem situation. <br /> Brasaemle asked if there were utility easements .6 the affe. 4 prop 3 Wc. <br /> Mr. White stated there were no utility easemem. • orth property lin- dded, if <br /> he was not granted the variance he would cut the , v :a- >ack to the two foot <br /> requirement. <br /> Stevenson stated his main concern was the . created )1i'(;-.1i\5,- space in between <br /> the side of the walkway and the fenceff . � a e variani` 4'uest is denied, the City <br /> should require the walkway to be cu �� $_, a ffi s e typ . . safety rail on the fence <br /> side of the walkway. <br /> • Peterson stated there are so _ ,.• Y �z ' <br /> nflict " the City ,; durance that need to be resolved, <br /> i.e., allowing a one-foot s ,g z for • r ways • • two-foot setback for sidewalks. He <br /> explained to the Whites t 3 . the P ng Co a a3'ssion denies the request they could <br /> appe• the decision m ity Cou eca, 'consideration, so the issue would not be <br /> d-a 's meet <br /> Br' c ted t• •f' `R4:tg. . e for two weeks to give staff the time they need to draft <br /> a resonial. <br /> >�sa <br /> C <br /> B 'mle s . K. •difying the ordinance so the setbacks of driveways and sidewalks <br /> the same. s"• ff ould eliminate the need for the variance that is being requested, <br /> ig.. r.:;... <br /> e added. Brasa., rsq °d the Commission the slope at the property line and safety <br /> considerations ld •e the hardships. <br /> IN/SECO P ':rooks/Miller to table Resolution 556-98, a Resolution Approving a <br /> es LI ffi a Sidewalk, 5249 Greenfield, Timothy White, until the September 16, 1998 <br /> R <br /> � �� � ., <br /> . . , ion meeting. The Commission directs staff to draft a Resolution approving the <br /> van: q ? the hardships as discussed at this meeting. <br /> Ayes - 5 Nays- 1(Obert) <br /> • Motion carried <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.