Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION Page 2 <br /> September 16, 1998 ID <br /> 3. Citizens' Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda <br /> There were no citizens'requests or comments on items not on the agenda. --j <br /> • <br /> 4. <br /> Planning Case No. 533-98 <br /> Property Involved: 5249 Greenfield Avenue <br /> Consideration of Resolution No. 556-98, A Resolution a rovin•< variance R. <br /> Sidewalk. <br /> Applicant: Timothy White <br /> The applicant, Timothy White, was present. <br /> Associate Ericson gave his report as follow <br /> The applicant was back before the P1 'trig Co !, •.'sion a •§ Mime after his original request <br /> had been tabled. At the September8 Pla..$ g Co is.sion meeting, significant discussion • <br /> was held regarding the merits of £ : e as '� as the i•4 rpretation of the language in the Code <br /> relating to setbacks. Because of ?fr:• y fact. •< Y•sossibl ,0` dships), such as the slope of the land <br /> north of the . age, safety ations cess elsewhere on the lot, the Planning <br /> Commiss'§ & ' -• to ta. - est to e f tai to draft both approval and denial versions of <br /> the res. • <br /> Staff was recothat thg � ->° ommission adopt Planning Commission Resolution <br /> 556-98, a Re • #i • g a �# 'ce for Timothy White of 5249 Greenfield Avenue, to <br /> allow forpuce• $�� back or a deck-like sidewalk. <br /> Ch. rson Peterson re kirg e floor to the Commission for questions of staff <br /> suggested the f• wing amendment to the Resolution: Add to the first WAF,REAS the <br /> •tive notes th. 'cson had included in Section(a)under the staff report Analysis. She also <br /> • addi..• � •iage that stated leveling of the sidewalk on the north side of the garage was <br /> • exposure of the garage footings. <br /> Obert stated the hardships that were being discussed were really not hardships but conditions that <br /> were brought on by the property owner. He voiced his opposition to the stated hardships and <br /> expressed his concern that the City was allowing too many variances for work that had been done <br /> without first applying for the proper work permits. • <br />