10-21-1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNING COMMISSION Page 4 September 16, 1998 • Miller asked if the island between the two parking lots would remain. Dan Hall, told the Commission the island would remain "as is." Obert recommended adding that final approval be contingent eon exe • . d recordation of s, a the easement document. MOTION/SECOND: ObertBrasaemle to approve Resew ion No. ..gid-98, � £ Approving a Variance Request to Allow a Joint Use P. ,Nb,t and 4 ' ess Arran n the Businesses and a Zero-Foot Parking Lot Setback, . • ... ... for 2200 & 22 . " ay 10, Daniel Hall representing the Mermaid. VOTE: Ayes- 6 Nays- 0 ; '14 IA2 carried 6. Planning Case No. 535-98 • Property Involved: 8111 Eastwood Ro.' Consideration of Resolution No. 55:%°a`` a Res•,. "ion app•i ' g a Variance to Allow for two • Curb Cuts. Applicant: Michael Tobias is OW The ap• � ael of present. Associate Eric 's repo t ..s: The appli . as re. 4 ¢v ariance from the Code requirement that states a single-family prope all be limite•. ` e= e curb cut. Earlier this year, the applicant took out a building pe • o resurface his d k` , which had access onto both Sherwood Road and Eastwood Reo-,.si At that time . dicated that a building permit could not be approved due to the n• • e nforming nature 'the driveway, unless the access to Sherwood Road was removed. The t agreed an. F;"- permit was issued. Subsequent reinspection of the property showed that s •o . ained, both having been improved contrary to the permit. The applicant f g i ting that they had two alternatives to resolve the situation: 1. Remove the driveway access to Sherwood Road 2. Apply for and receive a variance The applicant chose to apply for a variance in order to maintain the driveway in its present • condition.