Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission January 6, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> • <br /> Obert asked if he was building this house on the new lot for himself and Ericson stated yes. <br /> Miller asked if the lot was narrower than the other lots, and if so, was there any special reason <br /> why. Ericson replied that the remaining property would be 156 feet wide, leaving te:door open <br /> for a future resubdivision. Miller then asked how the proposed setback par-,y.,11)the existing <br /> homes on the block. Ericson replied that most of the houses are set bat. • forty feet, with <br /> the exception of the home on the subject property, which o '" .lly tajttakom Eastwood <br /> Road before Greenwood Drive was constructed. The pr. setbac <br /> .: °ees k.; t,: `, <br /> home wou <br /> be consistent with the other homes. 44, <br /> Peterson inquired about existing structures, and whethe:2145 the proposed p • 4$ , Ines, to <br /> which Ericson replied no. <br /> Brasaemle stated that while he will support this request4 e has - R . s about the subdivision <br /> because he likes the large lots that characterize the c' <br /> Peterson asked if the proposed home would x • : ; . `rage a 0which side of the lot the <br /> garage would be. Ericson responded that ome ": de a three-stall garage <br /> which would be oriented to the south en. ..f the pry®'erty. elminded the Commission that <br /> the footprint shown on the certificat- ot bind's. and is t® •n'for demonstration purposes <br /> only. <br /> Motion/Second: Brasaemle/t b o appr.` - .,•e`- : ion No. 567-99, a resolution <br /> recommen a ':•.pproval .. `.q r subdiv Daniels' -‘ ` .$ z 44 Greenwood Drive, requested by Dan <br /> Daniels.." . <br /> .ulati. <br /> Nays - 0 The motion carried. <br /> 6. <br /> Plan 6 g Case No. 539 MTV'lic Hearing) <br /> Pr•t y involved: 536it/% on Drive <br /> ?deration of Reso on No. 568-99, a Resolution Approving a Variance Request to Allow <br /> arage Exceed; the Maximum Permitted Height by One Foot. <br /> t: Dane es, property owner. <br /> { <br /> T - :1 as present: <br /> Ericson stated that Dan Gates, the applicant, is requesting a variance to permit his under- <br /> construction garage to exceed the maximum height requirements set by the city code. The city <br /> code specifies that any accessory building cannot exceed a height of 15 feet. The height of an <br /> • accessory building is not measured from the floor to the peak, but rather from the floor to a point <br />