Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 6A <br />Meeting Date: May 25th, 2000 <br />Type of Business: EB <br />EB: EDC Business <br />IN: Informational Item <br />of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: <br />Economic Development Commission <br />From: <br />Aaron Parrish, Economic Development Coordinator <br />Item Title/Subject: <br />Tax Increment Finance Policy Revisions <br />Date of Report: <br />May 3, 2000 <br />Background: <br />At the April meeting, the Commission examined a variety of alterations to Mounds View's Tax <br />Increment Finance policy. Additions to the policy are highlighted with bold text and are contained <br />within sections V, VI (new section), VII, and IX. In addition, I have made some minor formatting <br />changes. <br />Above and beyond the aforementioned changes, I have identified some additional changes that the <br />EDC might consider. In particular, the Application Proposal Review Worksheet, section XI, has <br />been reevaluated to include: <br />• Item 6: Project size: The square footage for each category has been reduced in the following <br />manner: <br />Previous <br />Proposed Modification <br />120,000+ <br />100,000+ <br />100,000+ <br />80,000+ <br />80,000+ <br />60,000+ <br />60,000+ <br />40,000+ <br />50,000 or less <br />40,000 or less <br />• Item 9: Real Estate Taxes: Criteria for taxes to be collected has been reduced. The following <br />table is illustrative: <br />As discussed in the previous staff report, the evaluation tool contained within our TIF policy is based <br />on a model developed by the City of Elk River. Since a majority of Elk River's projects involve the <br />development of vacant land, they can expect projects with higher square footages and tax <br />collections. Like many redeveloping communities, the projects undertaken in Mounds View are <br />typically smaller in size and scope. Accordingly, the proposed modifications are an attempt to <br />parallel actual development based on existing constraints. <br />Previous <br />Proposed Modification <br />$150,000 <br />Valuation = <br />$3,600,000 <br />$120,000 <br />Valuation = <br />$2,900,000 <br />$100,000 <br />Valuation = <br />$2,400,000 <br />$80,000 <br />Valuation = <br />$1,950,000 <br />$75,000(Valuation <br />= <br />$1,800,000 <br />$60,000 <br />Valuation = <br />$1,450,000 <br />$50,000 <br />Valuation = <br />$1,230,000 <br />$40,000 <br />Valuation = <br />$1,000,000 <br />$25,000 <br />Below $25,000 <br />Valuation = <br />Valuation = <br />$640,000 <br />$640,000 <br />$20,000 <br />Below $20,000 <br />Valuation = <br />Valuation = <br />$500,000 <br /><$500,000 <br />As discussed in the previous staff report, the evaluation tool contained within our TIF policy is based <br />on a model developed by the City of Elk River. Since a majority of Elk River's projects involve the <br />development of vacant land, they can expect projects with higher square footages and tax <br />collections. Like many redeveloping communities, the projects undertaken in Mounds View are <br />typically smaller in size and scope. Accordingly, the proposed modifications are an attempt to <br />parallel actual development based on existing constraints. <br />