Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission April 7, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 13 <br /> 1111 <br /> stated they are usually at least 14 feet off the ground which allows a ten-foot ladder to be in place <br /> without ready access from the ground. He stated another option is to place the sign directly on <br /> the ground with a lattice bottom. Mr. Cronin stated they understand they are guests and are <br /> concerned with addressing all issues. <br /> Chair Peterson stated if signs area roved he would be veryocal sho `,0»=V-'need to be <br /> PP �, <br /> removed. Hammerschmidt stated he shares that concern b -ves a' '`::i -' ept can be <br /> reached, if approved. <br /> Hammerschmidt stated the next step will be to apply fort submit <br /> Then it can be debated by the Planning Commission. _!_ <br /> Commissioner Laube stated that he would like to see thet� `rit. we style and size being <br /> proposed when the application is submitted. <br /> . <br /> Mr. Dean explained the signs are very site speci '' cult to : ": 'a sign that would <br /> work in all locations. Mr. Cronin stated if th.- -r- 44.3ev,. ::.ded theid, they will be able to <br /> provide more design details when the sites identi <br /> Hammerschmidt suggested he prepa :kis igger 1. 'out with .otos of the site that could be <br /> • presented to provide a more clear ® �: �' the .. Also a r oposal could be submitted with <br /> several vendors making a present on of whul ey wo erect. <br /> Commission k her stat,v,W,4: nning Cdatt,,F <br /> has been addressing how to prevent <br /> . <br /> billboara tering i. s_:�. ..`:aew and nowthey are being asked to consider multiple <br /> locations ' te. <br /> Y <br /> Commissioner:< g ted if a ;v,, he sites are approved, having pictures or video of the <br /> • <br /> site would t e $ to as o ress impacts to surrounding areas. Hammerschmidt agreed <br /> and sta.z e placeme R .. on the map are very preliminary in nature. He suggested that <br /> pictu .'se created of co ,A _enerated signs on these sites. <br /> CO;;. 'ssioner Miller s j.\d her support for Hammerschmidt's suggestion to rank the sites and <br /> . dude a sunset Wt vision for the billboards. <br /> $� enson asked if the Planning Commission is being asked to make a general <br /> co `� g ement. Ericson stated there are several elements related to capacity. He advised <br /> there is a current Code requirement to allow no more signs along the freeway unless advertising <br /> the use on the property. Therefore, a variance or a Code amendment would need to be <br /> considered to make it allowable. Ericson stated in the CRP District, it is possible for someone to <br /> propose a development plan. He suggested the Code limitation be addressed as well as the <br /> IPsignage issue within the CRP District and approval of a development plan. <br />