Laserfiche WebLink
Leon Variance <br /> Planning Case No. 553-99 <br /> • May 19, 1999 <br /> Page 3 <br /> f. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other <br /> property in the same zone. <br /> The purpose of the Code with regard to setbacks is that living space shall maintain a <br /> greater setback from the property lines than an accessory building (shed or garage) which <br /> requires a five-foot setback; or a deck, which requires a two-foot setback. The rationale is <br /> that living space is a more intensive use. Approving a reduced setback without suitable <br /> hardship would compromise the intent of the Code. <br /> g. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br /> property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the <br /> danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property <br /> values within the neighborhood <br /> A porch at the reduced side yard setback would probably not impair a supply of light or <br /> increase congestion, nor would it increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety <br /> or diminish property values. <br /> According to the City Code, all of the preceding criteria shall be satisfied in order to justify the <br /> • granting of a variance. After much analysis, it appears to staff that in this case there is no <br /> hardship, unless the Planning Commission were to take into consideration that the lot area is <br /> substandard. (The lot is 75 feet wide by 122 feet deep, for an area of 9,150 square feet, <br /> substantially less than the required 11,000 square feet.) Yet the width of the property--75 feet-- <br /> does comply with the Code,and it is a matter of property width, not depth or area, which is basis <br /> for this variance. <br /> Silver Lake Woods PUD: This lot was approved in 1985 as part of the Silver Lake Woods 2nd <br /> Addition subdivision and in conjunction with the Silver Lake Woods Planned Unit Development <br /> agreement. While density bonuses and reductions in frontage requirements were given to the <br /> development to allow for substandard lots, no mention is made in the documentation about <br /> allowance for reduced setbacks. <br /> Resident Comment: Staff sent out the required public hearing notices to properties within 350 <br /> feet of 7386 Parkview Terrace. The property owners to the north, Ken and Ann Stagg of 7390 <br /> Parkview Terrace, who would be most affected by this request, have provided a letter in which <br /> they indicate their support for this request. <br /> Options: <br /> A. Direct staff to prepare a resolution approving a variance for a reduced side-yard setback to <br /> • allow for the construction of a three-season porch five feet from the side property line. <br />