My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/09/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/09/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:00 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 8:38:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/12/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/12/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 8, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br /> <br />scheduled for August 15, 2005. He noted that Staff is projecting an 8-percent increase in the 1 <br />base levy based on expenditure increases of approximately the same percentage. He explained 2 <br />that the goal Staff had in developing this budget, in terms of the impact to the general levy, is to 3 <br />keep it at less than 10-percent. He stated that this is also consistent with past Council comments 4 <br />and citizen surveys where it was indicated that the desire was to keep the levy low. He stated 5 <br />that this is a starting point, open for discussion adding that the LGA cuts of $122, 217.00 brings 6 <br />the City down to a zero amount received for local government aid from the State of Minnesota. 7 <br />He stated that in order to make up that amount it would mean a 3-percent increase in the base 8 <br />levy if the City were to choose to levy for it. He noted that there are no levy limits in place for 9 <br />2006. 10 <br /> 11 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that there are two major personnel changes proposed, the first 12 <br />involves upgrading the Administrative Assistant to an Assistant to the City Administrator and 13 <br />adding communications coordination duties to the City Receptionist position; and the second 14 <br />involves adding Code Enforcement personnel and staff in the Community Development 15 <br />Department. He referenced the wages stating that 3-percent across the board was used to 16 <br />determine the increase in wages; he indicated that the health insurance would be an issue this 17 <br />year noting that the contract, approved last year, was capped in the second year, by the provider, 18 <br />at 18-percent and the City’s portion of that is an increase in the family insurance of 13.6-percent. 19 <br />He stated that at this point the preliminary budget has to be to the County by September 15, 2005. 20 <br />He explained that it generally follows a budget process time for the City Council where a 21 <br />preliminary levy is established and that means that the City Council can levy no more than that 22 <br />amount, but the levy can be reduced between that time and December when a final levy has to be 23 <br />certified to the County. He further explained that the preliminary levy is establishing the ceiling 24 <br />for the levy by September 15, 2005. 25 <br /> 26 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that it is important to note on the proposed budget that a lot of 27 <br />the base levy impact was reduced by placing a fair burden on the vehicle and equipment fund 28 <br />adding that the fund would have to be reviewed in detail to determine how the fund would be 29 <br />replenished. He stated that $259,000 was spent out of this fund last year noting that the current 30 <br />balance is $1.5 million and $622,000.00 of that balance is currently proposed for this year’s 31 <br />vehicle and equipment expenditures. He indicated that the City budgets an annual contribution 32 <br />of $90,000.00 to this fund and Staff plans to review the details of this fund as a part of this 33 <br />process. He stated that if they have questions or would like to see modifications made prior to 34 <br />the meeting on the 15th that could be done based on tonight’s discussion. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Council Member Stigney referenced the $122,217.00 LGA loss and asked what the percentage 37 <br />increase would be to the current 8-percent base levy if the City were to levy that amount to offset 38 <br />the loss. 39 <br /> 40 <br />City Administrator Ulrich explained that the 8-percent includes the increase to make up for the 41 <br />LGA loss. He further explained that the LGA alone is 3-percent, which is included in the 8-42 <br />percent base levy. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Mayor Marty clarified that they are only considering a preliminary levy at this time of 8-percent. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.