My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/09/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/09/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:00 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 8:38:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/12/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/12/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 8, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />would have restored monies to government aid noting that the original formula would have put 1 <br />back some of the funds for Mounds View but in the end it all collapsed and the monies that did 2 <br />remain were distributed to the smaller cities. He stated that they also considered bipartisan 3 <br />funding for a transportation bill, proposals on clean water legacy and smoking bans in restaurants 4 <br />and public places. He indicated that another special session could be called if the Governor 5 <br />deems that it is necessary noting that the regular session would begin next May 2006. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Representative Bernardy referenced the funding Mounds View received for the County Road J 8 <br />improvements stating that the City should be proud of the fact that the community did receive 9 <br />funding for the repair of their roads. She noted that one item that did not pass was the proposal 10 <br />to close up the loopholes that would prevent businesses from diverting their funds on tax 11 <br />payments. She indicated that the State did end up with a 4-percent annual increase for the 12 <br />Education Fund and they tightened the sexual predator and methamphetamine laws. She stated 13 <br />that the changes would help to restore some of the funding cut from education last year and 14 <br />reviewed with Council. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Mayor Marty stated that Council has asked before whether they could use MSA funds for road 17 <br />repairs and asked if this issue was discussed. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Senator Betzold stated that there was almost no bill period and when the transportation bill came 20 <br />up for discussion they had a major amendment to consider that put funds back into fund. He 21 <br />explained that the entire bill was basically re-written before it came over to the Senate adding 22 <br />that the Senate concurred with the recommended changes. He stated that he did not recall any 23 <br />specific discussions on the use of MSA funds adding that he does not see a lot happening in 24 <br />transportation this year. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Mayor Marty asked if the City could put in a request for next year. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Representative Bernardy stated that this was something that they were going to suggest adding 29 <br />that they could fill out the request and submit it, see what happens. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Senator Betzold stated that since the transportation funds were not passed this year they might 32 <br />consider it for next year and urged the Council to consider putting in a request for the funds. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Representative Bernardy stated that she would also like to let the Council know how proud she is 35 <br />to represent the Citizens of Mounds View. She stated that she is pleased to see so many 36 <br />individuals in this City involved in the Legislative process. She stated that she has received a 37 <br />huge response from the residents and is very proud to represent such an involved community. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Council Member Flaherty asked about the federal funding process for the transportation projects 40 <br />and clarified that the State would not have received funding had they not passed the legal limit to 41 <br />.08. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Representative Bernardy reviewed the federal funding process noting that this was going to be 44 <br />the year that the State would have received a huge amount for complying with the national limits. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.