Laserfiche WebLink
s, <br /> Juaire Development Review <br /> Planning Case No. 555-99 <br /> June 2, 1999 <br /> • Page 3 <br /> Parking: <br /> Each of the new townhouse-styled multi-family units is proposed to have a tuck-under attached <br /> two-car garage while the two units closest to the street will have driveway space for an additional <br /> two vehicles each. The Code requires that there be 2.5 parking spaces provided per unit and the <br /> applicant is proposing an average of three spaces per unit. There are two problems with the <br /> parking plan however that will need to be addressed before the site plan can be approved. First, the <br /> two units furthest from the street cannot have parking in front of the garage because there is not <br /> enough room. While this is not a desired situation, it could be acceptable if the tenants are made <br /> aware of this restriction. Second, and more importantly, there does not appear to be sufficient area <br /> for backing out of the complex. While it would be possible for cars from the two units closest to <br /> the street to back out of the garage and exit the property in a forward motion, the two end units <br /> can only exit the property in reverse. Staff would not be in support of this plan if there were no <br /> means to correct this situation. <br /> Building Character: <br /> While the City typically does not require that buildings be designed to the highest and most <br /> appealing aesthetic standards, there are some simple changes that staff would suggest could be <br /> utilized to improve the exterior appearance of this development. First, it would be suggested that <br /> • the entryways be moved so that they are at ground level and be protected with some type of <br /> overhang. Second, there should be an exterior light between each entryway and garage for safety <br /> and security purposes. Third, with the lowered entryway, there would be sufficient room for a <br /> secondwindow, perhaps in the foyer area. Last, the entryways for the end units should be moved <br /> so that access is taken from the sides of the building rather than the front. These changes, and any <br /> others proposed by the Planning Commission, should be incorporated into the site plans for final <br /> approval of the City Council. <br /> Utilities and Easements <br /> . - - <br /> ten-foot drainage and utility easements on the property's north and west sides which will more than <br /> likely serve as drainage areas for the development. There are no easements along the east lot line <br /> between the two vacant properties, and because the City typically requires that five-foot side yard <br /> drainage and utility easements be dedicated, this may be something that will need to be addressed. <br /> There is no need for garbage enclosures as garbage containers will be kept inside the garages. <br /> Other Issues: <br /> It can be seen on the certificate of survey that the neighboring property, Woodlawn Terrace <br /> Apartments, encroaches onto the subject property in two places near the southern end toward <br /> Woodlawn Drive. Woodlawn Terrace's dumpster enclosure and parking lot cross the lot line, <br /> • which is a violation of the City Code. Staff will be meeting with the owner of the apartment <br /> complex on June 1 to discuss this and other issues relative to the development of the four-plex. <br />