Laserfiche WebLink
L <br /> III Mounds View Planning Commission May 19, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> Mr. Leon explained that he believed his property was unique in that all the other homes in the <br /> neighborhood had a patio slab in the back which allowed for further expansion. <br /> Chair Peterson stated that he had driven by the property and had noticece fe . He asked if it <br /> would be removed. Mr. Leon stated that his fence located in e sideyar' : '$ be removed. <br /> : <br /> Commissioner Miller asked how they would address Item;,, F of the cn, >,;cY <br /> € °tai:'<' `` ial conditiik: <br /> or circumstances do not result from the actions of the a .; .., ant.' ,„,r ; T '� <br /> lasPki,‘ .s>,-Ii <br /> , t <br /> Ericson stated that they could maintain a hardship in thy :,e,Mased solely upon x that the <br /> fx 4 <br /> tittob <br /> house was situated on the lot creating a 10 foot setback fqfpwszstage. He stated that the garage <br /> required only a 5 foot setback, which would have provided >.t s d space for expansion. He <br /> stated that the placement of the structure on the lot wasrot the " F: - applicant. <br /> Commissioner Miler stated that if all the criteria:?tr =�:< .;, :41:te would'`upport a resolution granting <br /> approval of the variance. $° n..�` <br /> 5s <>:.;'�y,#fid.. $s<: __V <br /> rTuo <br /> Chair Peterson stated that they had recently approved a 5 $4:: ariance on a smaller home, but <br /> III viewed that differentlyas that was f.. <br /> ,�`�edroo `ghich is c � sidered living space. <br /> Commissioner Hegland stated t :;.:11:: `>` e`appli: _^t had p.:,.,:.0 sed the home the way that it was. He <br /> stated, how;ver, that horn'.. *.0 : s are nod< " `:ware of the City's requirements regarding <br /> variances backs, e;.IiITNIK War <br /> 111004 <br /> Mr. Murlo 4; . ..ated t :`�i , . � c ant assumed that since the deck was in place when he <br /> purchased the'ittab,,ould c.` `re:`'; a orch in the same area. <br /> Chair Pet "'s a ; r `., as th.nkful the applicant had come before the Commission before <br /> constn. g the porch.. . s that they needed to formally address the hardship issues that <br /> satis.0 the criteria. :f 4 w`sted staff be directed to conduct further research and submit a <br /> res: ion for considera °`'h a`''the next meeting scheduled for June 2, 1999. <br /> : • no further d'i-,.:ii ssion, Chair Peterson closed the Public Hearing at 7:50 p.m. <br /> °a . '' <br /> ` ed to direct staff to prepare a resolution approving a variance for a reduced side- <br /> ya ' :' < '` � .`allow for the construction of a three-season porch five feet from the side property . <br /> line. <br /> 6. Staff Reports/Items of Information <br /> IIA. Billboard Update <br />