Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 2 • <br /> A. May 5, <br /> 1999 <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Miller/Kaden to approve theMay 5, 1999 meeting minutes .: ' bmitted. <br /> Ayes—9 Nays—0 T ii _7-carried. <br /> carried. <br /> 5. PlanningCase No. 553-99 � <br /> r+ �' fit' <br /> Property Involved: 7386 Parkview Terrace :5 <br /> Consideration of a variance request for a reduced side yarn or athree-season porch <br /> Applicant: Mike & Sandy Leon <br /> �� 3w � <br /> The applicant was present. a� <br /> Planning Associate Ericson gave the staf port as -• to <br /> The applicants,Mike and Sandy Lei= requ g a van e fro:' :1 m the required ten-foot side yard <br /> setback established for principal gs an'ter ing sp °'herein. They would like to replace an 0 <br /> existing 10 x 12 square-foot 4 ec `''ith a aso a ng space addition of the same size in the <br /> same locate The deck, s existe nstruction of the house,is five feet from the <br /> north side f grope x � c'ect pro: * ° ocated in the Silver Lake Woods single family <br /> home de t the � ikAiii�� srner of County Road H2 and Silver Lake Road, and is only <br /> 9,150 s uare �� ft-of: Thi ,r s first heard at the May 19, 1999 Commission meeting, <br /> and after muc mT �� sta � 1' rected to explore in greater detail possible language <br /> addressing � � a� d •crite� "for granting a variance. <br /> Ericss t Voted the seven � . .bu shed for consideration of a variance whi . . .� + ., <br /> stat "that a variance ms obe granted in those cases where the Code imposes undue hardship <br /> o , ctical difficulties as ciated with the property which makes a literal interpretation of the Code <br /> • , burdensome or "trictive to a property owner. Ericson stated that it appeared to staff that in <br /> e a hards � es exist, and recommended that, if the Planning Commission concurred, a <br /> B. -i,c•• fl � anted to allow the applicants to construct a living space addition five feet from <br /> t � �`� y line. He stated that based upon the discussion at the last Commission meeting, <br /> staf a'% drafted language that related to the criteria in Resolution 579-99, a resolution which <br /> approves the Leons' variance request. He stated that he had received correspondence from adjacent <br /> property owners who indicated their support for the project. He noted that the date of adoption of <br /> the Resolution, listed on Page 3, should be amended to the present date. <br /> 0 <br />