Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 2, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> Kaden asked who would pay for the drainage improvements. Ericson stated that the applicant would <br /> be responsible for the cost of the improvements, and possibly the other improved pro s erty owners. <br /> Chair Peterson asked about the warranty for the drainage plan. Ericson ed t' here would be <br /> a warranty period to cover repairs should they be needed. In the future, . mould be the City's <br /> responsibility which, in his opinion, would be desirable to to o ' a . <br /> Miller asked about entrances for emergency vehicles. E'son state® tsw 11®' w,. . e;® y <br /> and vehicles could ingress and egress without difficulty. 7 ,stated at the lots . t ough <br /> to insure access. Miller asked where the fire hydrant ;4 1 �d. Bill Juaire stikeiir it was <br /> located at the southern corner of the lot. <br /> Hegland asked why there appeared to be a rush to coni. r this a.® o Ericson explained that <br /> he had been working with the applicant for two mo� �.urmg wht•s g as not made known <br /> to the developer that they would be required to F0:940. t . he City trilir He stated that staff <br /> was attempting to minimize the impact to th -,, icao 1. 1. add sing the matter earlier. He <br /> added that if the Planning Commission ; <br /> not co r .o e opting the Resolution at this <br /> time, they could hold the matter over u r P'the ne e <br /> Kaden asked what guarantees the r i R -ment ;, •uld be r if the Planning Commission made their <br /> recommendation to the City Cou to appro � i Eric . tated that if the conditions were not met, <br /> staff would T.9 ng it forware ,g L next Co s -g and recommend denial. <br /> Heglan. • ,she as. m 2e, to address revisions to the parking lot and providing <br /> additional o" 6, g spa <br /> Braathen re. .n to 14s- age regarding the drainage plan. Ericson stated that Page <br /> 2 of the ution in final drainage planwill be submitted and will be approved by the <br /> City .11.-neer." <br /> :110 requested the wo "them"in Item 4 of the Resolution be omitted. <br /> • ked if the ii cage pertaining to the landscaping was sufficient. Ericson stated that staff <br /> 0.1 guage based upon the discussion,but he believed it was sufficient. <br /> Chatrson requested that Condition 1 of the Resolution include the statement"approved by City <br /> staff and the City Forester." <br /> Hegland requested the addition on the plan of standard, to-scale, vehicle outlines to indicate the <br /> amount of room available in the parking spaces. Ericson stated staff will assure parking spaces are <br /> in accordance with the City Code. <br />