Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution 587-99 <br /> Gregory Variance • <br /> July 7, 1999 <br /> Page 2 <br /> WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal <br /> Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which all must be <br /> satisfied,in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,the Mounds View Planning Commission <br /> finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View <br /> Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient hardship with regard to the property <br /> located at 2801 Woodale Drive to warrant the approval of a variance to Michael and Christine <br /> Gregory for the construction of a 672 square-foot garage fifteen feet from the property line, and <br /> makes the following findings of fact related to its decision: <br /> 1. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to 2801 Woodale Drive which do not <br /> apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity in that the house and <br /> garage were built in 1953, predating the City's zoning code by seven years. <br /> 2. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of <br /> rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this <br /> Title in that multiple car garages are common features in this district and serve as a <br /> physical improvement to properties. • <br /> 3. The variance request is the result of factors over which the applicants had no control. The <br /> house and garage were constructed in such a way that made the garage non-conforming <br /> with the advent of the City's Zoning Code. <br /> 4. Granting a variance to allow a two-car garage in the same location as the existing single- <br /> stall garage, without further encroaching into the setback, would not be a special privilege. <br /> Multiple-car garages are standard residential features while single stall-garages are <br /> becoming functionally obsolete. <br /> 5. The variance requested is not the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. <br /> The Planning Commission finds that a fifteen-foot setback, as opposed to the requested <br /> eleven-foot setback, would alleviate the applicant's hardship. <br /> 6. The purpose of the variance provision in the Code is to give relief to property owners <br /> seeking to improve their properties yet are unable to do so because of zoning code <br /> requirements and factors beyond their control. Granting this variance for a two-car garage <br /> utilizing the same setback as the existing garage would not be materially detrimental to the <br /> purpose of this Title or to other property in the same zone. <br /> 7. A 672 square-foot garage at a fifteen foot setback from Silver Lake Road would not <br /> impair a supply of light or increase congestion, nor would it increase the danger of fire or • <br /> endanger the public safety or diminish property values. <br />