Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 16, 1999 <br /> Regular.Meeting Page 4 <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Laube/Peterson to adopt Resolution 581-99, a Resolution Recommending <br /> • <br /> Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for Outdoor Produce Sales at Moundsview Square, Requested <br /> by Merryville Farm Market; Planning Case No. 554-99, as corrected and amended. <br /> Ayes—6 Nays—0 The motion carred. <br /> } <br /> 6. Planning Case No. 557-99 <br /> Ail' -41.0;.7,-,A,, <br /> Property Involved: 7690 /7692 Silver Lake Road '` <br /> Consideration of a minor subdivision01 .,:. <br /> oft t,. <br /> Applicant: Meiho Lee .. mr <br /> The applicant was not present. .. ,,: <br /> Planning Associate Ericson gave the staff report a <br /> ` <br /> Actirt The applicant,Meiho Lee, is requesting City atoval •1 ° bd: ` ion to create two lots from <br /> her property located at 7690/ 7692 Silver4 ke Roa< Th "rk4altbaivision regulations allow for <br /> approval of a surveyor's certificate in the situatio ><<however ore complex and detailed full plat <br /> may be substituted. This property, los: at the thwest corner of County Road I and Silver Lake <br /> Road, currently has 202 feet of nage on::..€aunty Ro ;< and 116 feet along Silver Lake Road. <br /> There is a twin home existin. oe lot the t :.es ags from Silver Lake Road. The applicant <br /> proposes to •t off an irre& ,ion of 1.Lq. "West half of the existing lot to create a new, <br /> 12,500 sN:01.�t lot wi t ;A of fronts t t ounty Road I. The dimension of both of these <br /> s. <br /> lots, as s `. ��:e surve V : eet the City's minimum requirements as specified in Chapter <br /> 1104 of the' m R .. ..e. <br /> Ericson pres- $ >!.t4,i"ei:4V, sis, noig that the lot is 25,450 square feet in area, which is enough <br /> land area., oe subdivide.<i . at to the City Code requirement of 12,500 square feet per R-2 lot. <br /> 1,'' <br /> mai :°'n the setbacks ani „* 00 foot lot width requirements, the proposed subdivision is rather <br /> irr 'lar in shape, whic oes not lend itself well to an easy legal description. He stated that the <br /> ..i” .ant, under advi ` ent of her surveyor, has proposed to replat the property which would <br /> o e the needa confusing legal description, and result in a more simple lot and block <br /> agr <br /> 4 5 s. .. / iroposed subdivision. Ericson noted that the Land Development section of the <br /> • ._biiVirk°'lan discourages the approval of any subdivision creating"flag lots" or other irregular <br /> lots. . • 'ed that the proposed subdivision, while it is irregular, is not a flag lot. <br /> Ericson noted that there were drainage issues. He stated that a pond exists, as indicated on the <br /> Certificate of Survey, which remains throughout the year, and that at times of rain, the pond tends <br /> to spread and cover a significant area of the backyards, as well as a property with an existing twin • <br /> home to the south. He stated that the property owner to the south has been pumping water out onto <br />