Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 16, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> • Jopke reported that at the City Council meeting on June 14, the Council approved first reading of the <br /> ordinance amending the Building Code for contractor's licenses. He stated that the Council voted <br /> to accept the public improvements at the theater project, and had approved a resolution requesting <br /> an additional six month extension to the Comprehensive Plan update. He stated that the Council had <br /> approved the Development Review for the initial four-plex located on Woodlawn Drive. <br /> 0•57' <br /> Ericson stated that staff had received over one thousand responses to the In :ane urvey. He stated <br /> that one of the questions posed in the survey was in reg. !. to why >;�,e, ,:of information the <br /> community would like to keep abreast of. He stated that they '-ceived k - hundred E-m <br /> addresses from people who were interested in being kept ` firmed reg ;eine;;° • _ ;`•. nings wi I n <br /> the City. He stated that he felt the Internet was an exci: mediu ich t € $ °''•; iter <br /> communication between the City and the community. He '<. tha 4 i the future, h. :a$4,eivable <br /> that many City processes could be accomplished over th' Imit <br /> Commissioner Laube asked if staff had received any coeun 'cm the State regarding the <br /> billboard issue. Jopke stated that he had spoken with tviState R p '" ayes, who indicated that <br /> Commercial or Industrial zoning requirements wer a stated ��" 4 ;:council's reaction was <br /> that the City could get its 'house in order', and if, %, :• as unab ;..btain a permit from the <br /> State, it would be their problem. Commissio - :ube . : <e t.>:'k. nsevplause could be added to the <br /> billboard ordinance to allow the ordinan. o be n `>a • 1 :: *`State denies permits. Jopke <br /> 0 stated that the language of the ordinance`ould b F eviewe.Mir* <br /> Jopke updated the Commission ^ ding >€Mermaiproject. He noted that they are still <br /> negotiating with the adjacent prc erty owns =viand.h,a4ieached tentative agreement with two of <br /> them. He sTe d, however4. ;ambert site::: t°willing to cooperate. He stated they had <br /> prelimin. " " `%.ation fr�""`.>` : •to that t ' t obtain a redevelopment grant. He noted that <br /> s- <br /> the deve a9 ply die."i .. ,,e the project back, and that there were a number of different <br /> options avai"` _, tated .:•.:.a..:R:v •oken to a developer who was working to acquire a site <br /> for the develop ; algree > :':.� <br /> '. <br /> M, . < tore. <br /> 9. C f: person .' ;. i;';ging Commissioners Report <br /> No ._ er reports were c `•' ed. <br /> 1i Adjournment <br /> in . .•. Wier business before the Planning Commission, Chair Peterson adjourned the <br /> E.Y <br /> 8 <br /> IP15m <br /> . <br /> (The meeting immediately adjourned to the Agenda Session) <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> • <br />