Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 11, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br /> <br />better deal that what was discussed in New Brighton. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Ms. Haake stated that she did ask for additional information on July 2nd regarding the referendum 3 <br />and what the citizens need to do. She asked how many signatures would they need for the 4 <br />petition. 5 <br /> 6 <br /> City Administrator Ulrich stated that he did forward an email today noting that they would need 7 <br />approximately 989 signatures. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Ms. Haake indicated that she was referred to Chapter 8205, Secretary of State for the Petitions, 10 <br />noting that it states how the petition has to be worded and it does state that they could paraphrase 11 <br />the question that would be on the ballot yet the City Charter, under 5.07, states that the wording 12 <br />of the referendum by petition shall state at the head of each page the exact text of the measure to 13 <br />be considered by the electorate. She asked if she should go by the City Charter 5.07 and include 14 <br />the exact wording used on the petition at the top of the ballot. 15 <br /> 16 <br />City Attorney Riggs stated that this would make the most sense and is what was discussed in the 17 <br />email sent by City Administrator Ulrich. He suggested that they use that form noting that it is 18 <br />consistent and interpretive based on the Minnesota Rule 8205-1010. He stated that this would be 19 <br />the safest and most credible approach because everyone will know and understand what they are 20 <br />voting on. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Ms. Haake stated that a meeting is scheduled at Hillview Park tomorrow evening, Tuesday, July 23 <br />12, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 pm. and also Thursday, July 14th, 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. for residents 24 <br />to come out and sign the petitions. She stated that they also plan to walk the neighborhoods 25 <br />noting that so far, based on the phone calls, she has heard feedback from residents who are 26 <br />concerned about what she is doing and also wanted clarification as to what the referendum is all 27 <br />about. She reviewed the calls with the Council noting that the results could prove to be very 28 <br />interesting. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Cindy Sudeska, Hillview Road, stated that the golf course is nice to have adding that she also 31 <br />believes that Medtronic is a good company. She stated that she is not against either of the 32 <br />options noting that there is benefit with both. She stated that given a choice there is more 33 <br />expenses with the golf course adding that to the south the City would probably see an increase in 34 <br />general business for the area and agreed that there would probably be an increase in the area 35 <br />traffic. She stated that she really believes that the people of Mounds View should have good 36 <br />understanding of what a TIF District is adding that if they were to look at Medtronic’s financial 37 <br />statement they would see that Medtronic’s profit for one year is approximately $2 billion, which 38 <br />is their discretionary income and in comparison, the average income for the City of Mounds 39 <br />View is approximately $40,000. She explained that if they were to further compare the $2 billion 40 <br />in discretionary income for Medtronic to the discretionary income for Mounds View it would 41 <br />equate to approximately $ .02. She stated that she wants what is fair and reasonable for both 42 <br />sides and would like to see Staff do further exploration to find a fair deal that is good for both 43 <br />sides. She expressed concerns stating that she could actually visualize taxes going up because of 44 <br />Medtronic and she does not feel that she or any other resident should be expected to subsidize 45