My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/08/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/08/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:37 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 10:26:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/22/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/22/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 11, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 36 <br /> <br />language in the Charter, which is where the courts would step in and say no this is an 1 <br />administrative act and they are only doing this because there is language in the Charter that says 2 <br />to do this. He stated that legislative items have to be far reaching, long standing and they have to 3 <br />affect the citizens. He stated that the ordinance is enforceable against everyone and everyone has 4 <br />to abide by it noting that the ordinance that they adopted tonight will be published next week and 5 <br />once it is published and the deed occurs the ordinance no longer has any validity and doesn’t go 6 <br />into the City code as a codified ordinance, it goes into the back as a land transfer. He stated that 7 <br />there are a number of provisions in the Charter that are overruled by State law and offered to 8 <br />review with Council at a work session. He stated that the process is valid and citizens have the 9 <br />right to move forward with any type of petition noting that this is a difficult hurdle to deal with 10 <br />because they usually don’t meet the standards. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Council Member Gunn asked if Council could direct Staff to write up the resolution for their 13 <br />review. She stated that the Council is aware that this process is going to happen and suggested 14 <br />that they let this part happen and they have the resolution if it is needed. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Council Member Flaherty stated that his is still very against trying to short-circuit the petition 17 <br />adding that he would much prefer that this to go to referendum than to circumvent. He stated 18 <br />that he wants to be sure that they know the guidelines. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Council Member Gunn agreed that it does need to go forward noting that City Attorney Riggs did 21 <br />state that there is a probability that it won’t fly. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Council Member Thomas stated that it is premature at this point to set it up adding that there are 24 <br />bigger questions that should be answered. She asked if Staff is going to require the entire 25 <br />ordinance and is the ordinance Council just passed going to be part of the petition. She clarified 26 <br />that the language of the petition must contain the ordinance. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Council Member Gunn asked if the City would have to pay for the entire ordinance to be placed 29 <br />on the ballot and if so they need to start working on the process. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Council Member Thomas asked when the petition would have to be in and when is it appropriate 32 <br />to ask if this is a legislative or administrative act. She stated that they need to get this 33 <br />information from Staff and then move forward. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Council Member Stigney clarified that the committee that signs up for the petition must be 36 <br />residents and should be included on each page of the petition. He asked who is allowed to go out 37 <br />and obtain signatures. 38 <br /> 39 <br />City Attorney Riggs reviewed the petition requirements and confirmed that they have to be 40 <br />citizens of Mounds View and registered to vote. He stated that they also have to sign an affidavit 41 <br />certifying that those are the people that signed in front of them. He stated that this is clarified in 42 <br />Section 5.02 of the City Charter. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.