My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-21-1999
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
07-21-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2024 9:17:20 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 10:34:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/21/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />Planning Commission Resolution 588-99 <br />July 21, 1999 <br />Page 2 <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings that possible adverse <br />effects have been considered in its recommendation, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 1.e.: <br />1. Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas so as <br />to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential property in <br />general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property, 8059 Red Oak Drive, as low -density <br />residential. This proposal does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />2, 4. The Geographical Area Involved & the Character of the Surrounding Area. <br />In this area of Mounds View, most of the lots are larger than the subject property. The <br />homes are generally of a similar style architecture and were built around the same time, <br />although the subject home is newer and is larger than those in the immediate area. Many <br />of the homes in the immediate area have larger garages, most of which are detached as in <br />this proposal. A larger garage on the subject property would not appear out of place. <br />3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. <br />Adding to the existing garage will have an immediate positive impact on the value of the <br />subject property. At 1,000 square feet, set back from the street as far as it is, this garage <br />addition probably would not depreciate the surrounding area in any way. <br />5. The demonstrated need for such a use. <br />The existing garage --while a two stalls-- is considered fairly small by today's standards. The <br />applicants both have vehicles as do their children. In addition, the applicants own a boat which they <br />would like to have stored within the garage. Clearly the need for additional garage space has been <br />demonstrated. <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings regarding the criteria <br />for approval of a conditional use_permit,as required by Section 1125 01 Subd <br />1. The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other <br />public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. <br />7. The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. <br />8. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be provided. <br />Adding on to a small garage would not create a greater impact on existing public facilities, parks, <br />schools or services, on utilities or access roads, nor would it create an increase in traffic on <br />adjacent streets. <br />2. The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent <br />residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and <br />there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. <br />3. The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.