Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />July 7, 1999 <br />Page 7 <br />Commissioner Miller asked if it would be possible to indicate that cars were for sale inside of the <br />building, to prevent the problem of the public driving by and seeing a sign from the roadway. Mr. <br />Besonen stated yes. <br />Council Member Stigney stated that this was a rental business, and t <br />bringing a car to the lot for a specific customer. He stated <br />advertising automobiles for sale at the location. <br />Chair Peterson stated that he concurred with Ericson' <br />signage would be unacceptable. He noted that Commissi <br />would certainly be acceptable, but that the issues of st <br />advertising would have to be addressed further. He requeste <br />to other businesses or the public parking their cars on <br />Ericson explained that ifa person or property owner w <br />of their lot it would be allowed. He stated that in <br />itself, the Commission was provided the opportu <br />He stated that if the Commission felt strly that <br />requirement could be added to the resolution to reflethat. <br />consider the issue on its own. <br />Commissioner Stevenson stat <br />signage, he believed there sh <br />the Com ':=.n should .. <br />limitati tter c I <br />already 1 ;:# cars <br />to the sign itsel _'<. < > :': at alth <br />translate into ar*..i..ht <br />Stevenson <br />signage vertising the's <br />utilizeda the applicant's <br />on the reasons they d <br />eterson stated t <br />and that <br />ed`at althou <br />a rule li <br />nthat tit. <br />of han <br />pplicant would be <br />to see any signage <br />s,IPThat any e anent <br />s suggestion of in or signage <br />e windows or other forms of <br />n of the City Code, in regard <br />le" signs in the windows. <br />park a ' i :.ttk sale on the pavement <br />a Con '':dal. se Permit and the use <br />itional re' =notions upon the signage. <br />oever should be allowed, a <br />fined that the Council could also <br />the Co t ission could not rule on the matter of <br />Ie stated that if this was a Council action, <br />''!it address the issue. He stated that without <br />mmissioner Johnson stated that the applicant was <br />e time. Ericson stated that the concern was more in regard <br />Ow sign might be allowable, without limitations, it might <br />shee ywood, which would be unacceptable. Commissioner <br />the ise should be addressed and clarified prior to agreeing to allow <br />three cars. Commissioner Kaden asked what type of signage was <br />siness location. Mr. Besonen stated that there was none, and that <br />eitPstreet visibility was to inform the public that they had vehicles for sale. <br />often times the public associated a rental car facility with the purchase of <br />,ny people would simply inquire. Commissioner Kaden noted that automobiles <br />he former fire station located in Spring Lake Park, and that the largest signage <br />ere was paint or a sign in the window. He stated that he did not find that type of <br />signage o .jectionable. <br />Mr. Besonen stated that he had noticed the Enterprise car lot in Spring Lake Park, and believed that <br />their signage indicated sales and rentals. Council Member Stigney stated that the sales were not on <br />site at that location. Mr. Besonen stated that their car sales would not necessarily be on site either, <br />as the majority of time, the cars would be rented. He suggested the possibility of signs in the cars on <br />