Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />July 7, 1999 • <br />Page 18 <br />consultation with staff, and continue to dialogue with their providers to determine the direction of <br />the level of service for the facility. He stated that he believed this facility met the requirements for <br />setbacks. He added that the use would be appropriate for many different reasons. Hesitated that he <br />would like to know if there were any other issues which he should resear. <br />Commissioner Kaden asked for clarification of the landscaping$ <br />Pinkerton stated that the site plan did not provide a detailed`,; <br />zf.. <br />was to remain on the property as a buffer. <br />Ericson stated that the first step in this process was the cor <br />Use Permit. He stated that the applicant was aware that th ?t iai t x ta11 <br />for a Development Review, which would provide a more in, <br />and parking requirements. He stated that the Council a : ' >omrti <br />to provide greater input, and that there would be amptetitime for <br />Ruth Berke, 2683 Lake Court Circle, aske <br />subject property would remain a senior building, if then <br />Use Permit. She stated that she was conceged that <br />the future due to the changed zonings <br />Ericson stated that the Conditional:="Permit,>ti <br />was changed in the future, and Was sufficien <br />reviewed. <> ated, howet£ if an ap <br />ma's <br />-. <br />.: <br />o ,.;;: <br />added tlt< on ern wasie explain <br />type of us , _ ® r permitt <br />Aw- <br />that if a halfw <br />Use Permit. He <br />that the out."' <br />Peterso ` ated that <br />requi.: ;dents, which wo <br />alas indica. <br />scape pl <br />the site plan. Mr. <br />cated only w <br />at&cl`of the rezoningnnditional <br />have to come before the City <br />t the site plan, landscaping, <br />uld have the opportunity <br />i1ed discussion. <br />e any assurance that the <br />ed to allow the Conditional <br />shelter or a halfway house in <br />'bid be spOft to this use. He stated that if the use <br />f " similar to the approved use, it would need to be <br />tiding was proposed, it could be allowed, and <br />t the Conditional Use Permit would apply to this <br />puld not come back before the Council. He stated, however, <br />were proposed, it would require a different Conditional <br />;election provided to the City and the residents. He added <br />jthouti°a Conditional Use Permit is a multi -family dwelling. Chair <br />4,4tdential uses there would be different parking ratios and other <br />Eftir a review of the permit. <br />erke stated that she -lived in close proximity to the proposed development, and therefore, she <br />ncerned about,at could happen in the future. She asked if any of the Commissioners had <br />the Silv;:,ke Commons site. She stated that she believed this property was setting a <br />d the Commissioners to go to the location to see what could be expected from <br />the y >�Commissioner Stevenson stated that he agreed with Ms. Berke in that this property <br />neede• to be cleaned up. He requested that she also consider that this was the same party who <br />developed Silver Lake Pointe, the 83 unit senior facility directly across the street from her residence. <br />Ms. Berke stated that this facility was very nice. <br />Chair Peterson stated that they should address the proposal to change the property from a commercial <br />to a residential use. He stated that the property had been vacant for quite some time and asked if a <br />• <br />• <br />