07-21-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting July 7, 1999 • Page 20 in August. He stated that if there was a consensus among the Commissioners, staff could draft a resolution, which could be completely re -drafted at their next meeting if necessary. Commissioner Stevenson requested information on the difference betwee_: the versus a B-2 development. Ericson stated that staff could provide that): t "Woon. ` ase for an R-4 Chair Peterson stated that another issue is the intensity of t ei`use, and a ; t p his opinions. less intensive use than B-2 commercial would be more curable at t lot : t mmissio t rs Miller and Stevenson stated that they agreed. Cha< 'eterscz:: 'requested t?': > rom Commissioner Kaden regarding his view on R-4 zoning.'. ner Kaden staftdllis vie w was not specific to this proposal, but a general observation. llkt however, that this proposal did seem like a lower intensity use of the property than a comercomme A regard to traffic, and that at this point he was undecided. Commissioner Stevenson asked what percentage oft:> .`rgay in the it is non-i nta1 He stated that this proposal would not be the same as an al) _. < e t ng nottn that primarily, what they ' l i h a h t they were trying to avoid. have in Mounds View R-4 districts are r�#al units t:��'.;.;::. Commissioner Stevenson stated that he did not think the sub tperty would be very conducive to that type of change. Ericson statedthat it wuid not meet°"any of the Building or Fire Code requirements. Commissioner Johnson Ated that would 1c to see a List of businesses that would be acceptable at that location, noting;that the e were a n er of low -density businesses that could work at that location as well Chair P :. <'::ted that _ nnea t they had only a general consensus among the Commissioners. Ericsonli ea. should raig 1 n the public hearing July for the 26 Council Meeting. Commissione t' 1 ted yes*. Mr. Pinkerta: ublicgearing could be set. Ericson stated that it was a matter of et blic and havingtime to send the notice to the newspaper, sending per notificatr`ai��?,� enough g whit .:e uires a seven-da:: _ :: ', "ce in addition to the legal requirement of ten days. He stated that he d set the public henggf"or the August 9th City Council meeting, and that staff would continue t• earch the issues, a4.4...h44.,4.i bring them forward at the next Planning Commission meeting. inning Case No. SP-072-99 Consi eration of Resolution 585-99, a resolution recommending adoption of proposed Ordinance 632, an ordinance amending Chapter 1113 of the Mounds View Zoning Code, pertaining to permitted uses within the B-2, Limited Business commercial zoning district