07-21-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting July 7, 1999 • Page 22 in the building had encountered some difficulty being leased, due to its limited visibility. He stated that he was not aware of any businesses that would be displaced, adding however, that staff would research the matter. Chair Peterson stated that the Commission should determine whetl:> ot the ordinance amendment was the proper way to proceed. He inquired regg the ""`f s five interpretation FS' of the Code, which would allow the matter to proceed witl st amendin :•< Ericson stag that staff interpreted that this use was sufficiently similar nth the pur ". _ ::. :t.f this z g district, and had issued a building permit to Kraus -Andy . n to perform the intelr;: this lease. Chair Peterson asked about the current language oft ; and its relativil >pes of businesses that Ericson had indicated. Ericson stated, a e proposed amendment was the result of this particular use, it would also apply to instructsop >`ucational types of uses which the Code had not previously addressed. 4; Chair Peterson noted that B-2 zoning is intended.::; presently he could not think of any higher type :el` than that intended by B-2 requirements. ated thi allow additional uses which are reasonabl >and logical Commissioner Hegland asked if th. ;ere an regard to play areas, and parking 1 1:that the and Johnson stated that they dot beliq Commissio& Johnson d"ti3at, in h Commis:::.: yy:... er state that the was adding that th at times when safety issue Co faci Toner Braathen s s, and that the Cos s are the responsil} red by the lessor allowing ar, x,v ntensity re i =service. He stated that from ; $ ivate educational facility 'r of cleaning up the Code to additionaliyquirements on educational facilities in ►lnmissioatwas not aware of. Commissioners Miller sues should be the Commission's concern. #''this would be the school's responsibility. amendmen w s intended for private facilities, not public, and ool. Commissioner Hegland stated that he did not agree, :generate large amounts of traffic at this type of location, resent. He stated that he was concerned in regard to the this proposal provides businesses the opportunity to run their own lion should not attempt to run these businesses. He added that these sty of the school. Chair Peterson added that the responsibility would also ommissioner Hegland stated that he did not agree, and that he was not in viols in B-2 designated areas. ND: Stevenson/Miller. To Approve Resolution 585-99, a Resolution which Recommends Adoption of Ordinance 632, an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1113 of the Mounds View Zoning Code pertaining to Permitted Uses within the B-2, Limited Business Zoning District, Special Planning Case No. SP-072-99. Ayes-7 Nays — 1 (Hegland) The motion carried.