My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-21-1999
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
07-21-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2024 9:17:20 PM
Creation date
8/1/2018 10:34:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/21/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />July 7, 1999 • <br />Page 26 <br />Jopke stated that, as the billboards would have to be on City owned property, the City would <br />ultimately have control over their location. He stated that staff would continue to work with the City <br />Attorney, and report back to the Planning Commission at a future meeting. <br />10. Staff Reports / Items of Information <br />A. Previous Council Action <br />Community Development Director Jopke reported on <br />June 28 and July 6. <br />B. Meiho Lee Subdivision Update <br />Planning Associate Ericson reported that staffwas c3 into research<> drainage issues relating <br />to the Meiho Lee Subdivision. He stated that, the rQ ' rs south of the subject property do <br />not appear to support this proposal, due to thop possible ffinage, and the possibility of <br />flooding in this area. He stated that ores of the propertyryt4fo the south of the applicant's <br />property who owns a through -lot, indicated that h� would note agreeable to giving consent to allow <br />.�ram'. <br />for a drainage way through his pro �.fit .to directhe run -onto the wetland. Ericson stated that he <br />Agiv had spoken with the applicant w :..4s aware" at this matter might take some time to resolve. He <br />added that when further infor nat :n comes . € <lanning Commission, staff would notify the <br />property o t`r who indi ,at they vv t yl t eato attend the discussion. <br />ell actions from their eting on <br />Planning Assoc' <br />Planning C.„_ <br />Conditi..:l1.Jse Perini <br />tses / Public Hearings <br />in reported!that there would be many planning cases coming before the <br />s'deratIbn in the future. He stated that there were currently two. <br />or oversize garages, and a request from Holiday Station. Stores <br />for a nditional Use P:;:: ;1operate an outdoor produce stand. He added that there was a <br />we d alteration permi :eqnest and vacation of a drainage and utility easement, which were <br />P ` g- <br />Chairper wand Planning Commissioners Reports <br />its were considered. <br />12. Adjournment <br />There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chair Peterson adjourned the <br />meeting at 10:27 p.m. <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.