08-04-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission July 21, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 3 • aside for 18-20 vehicles. With the vehicle parking in front of the bays and along side of the building, there is room for 23 vehicles at the site. Also discussed at that meeting was the need for landscaping improvements,which the applicant had indicated would be acceptable, though other than the removal of some of the plantings that are sickly or dying, no specific plans have been submitted for this. Staff will discuss this matter with the applicant and the City Forester and will make specific recommendations in this regard. 40, Ericson stated that there was discussion of the general criteria, which apptio..:afs, conditional use permit and the specific criteria which applies to this type of use,*0 that all o s`.. criteria were met. G ..:.: �y�Ac.C`'�t��': He stated that this location has a long history of automotivese, and t t #> ofthe property4< commercial although the comprehensive plan indicates a to -density residential dei tr tion. Ericson stated that due to the long-standing commercial history ,:.,.this location and the<ii pen ing re ision <: ,k, sta FIs that to the comprehensive plan, which could re-designate this rotiq as 'commercial us `' the inconsistency with the comprehensive plan could be st,Ortagy. He added that'sta `believes a residential use would not be appropriate at this property propertAiitakhIpcated at the intersection of Highway 10 and Spring Lake Road. = ' 4.97 ftek Ericson reviewed the stipulations of the conditional s ;permit as tiltlin in the resolution. He stated the resolution also addresses conditional s { ,,pertaini`n tro previous uses at this location. He stated that the first paragrapht t"Page of t e r soluti n provided that all previous property conditional use permits on file with this would'become > ' coked rescinded and considered null and void", and that this language h "been approved by the ity Attorney. fx • Commissioner Miller noted a discre anc in r :and to the ours that the applicant had proposed, a s.. � Y PP P P 7:00 a.m. start time, and the conditional use permit. which indicates an 8:00 a.m. start time. Ericson stated the ho,,,listed in the:;:re mutton for the co di iot al use permit were more permissive than the hours the ::=:licant had r `ue ed: _.He stater ` at the could be listed exactlyas the applicant had ..;13:.,.:_:::<..: Vit.,:.,.<>�.. w-t.. Y the d Commission. requested�tt �i sii' �i �the� Chair Peterson st :,eft at it wase e consensus of the Commission to direct staff to amend the resolution t9,...ogritat.ittiammencettOfit of business to be 7:00 a.m. Co ioner Kaden ast '::< . ` `'":' -- : : I . : ..:. : , •.•.- . •a . - '-. • .'•. • - consiations, if a busiosskii` homeowner desired to expand their impervious surface. •Ericson stat 'yes. He explainedthat typically, the Public Works Department or the City Engineer would be ` "`ted. He added tbit in this case, he had forwarded the site plan to SEH who analyzed how the al impervious rface would impact the site, and it was believed that there would not be a 6t:4101 that the drainage, accomplished with two catch basins in the parkinglot area, ..� :>; :;m romised. MOTION/SECOND: Laube/Johnson. To Approve Resolution No. 586-99, a Resolution Recommending to City Council Approval of a Conditional use Permit Request From Thrifty Car Rental to Operate an Outdoor Rental Operation at 2975 Highway 10; Planning Case No. 562-99, with stipulations. •