My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-04-1999
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
08-04-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 10:44:55 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 10:43:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/4/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Skeate CUP Request <br /> 2809 Woodale Drive <br /> August 4, 1999 <br /> Page 3 <br /> In this area of Mounds View, most of the lots are as large or larger than the subject <br /> property. There is a good mix of architecture present in the neighborhood, with some of <br /> the houses being older and some newer. The subject home, however, is much smaller than <br /> those in the immediate area. Many homes in this area have large garages yet they do not <br /> appear out of place because the houses are larger as well. While a larger garage could be <br /> accommodated on the subject property, it would not be proportionally consistent with the <br /> house. <br /> 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. <br /> It can be generally assumed that adding to the existing garage would have a positive <br /> impact on the value of the subject property. It is not known whether a garage three times <br /> larger than the home would have a negative monetary impact upon the neighborhood, <br /> even though it may be visually obtrusive. <br /> 5. The demonstrated need for such a use. <br /> The existing garage--at 720 square feet-- is considered fairly typical by today's standards. <br /> While it does not have access for three vehicles, there is ample work area and supplemental <br /> • storage space beyond that space needed for the vehicles. However with multi-car families <br /> being the norm rather than the exception, demonstrating the need for additional garage space <br /> becomes less of an issue. <br /> In staff's opinion, this proposal does not satisfy the adverse effects criteria. <br /> General CUP Criteria: <br /> Also in Section 1125.01, the Planning Commission is to examine the criteria for granting a <br /> conditional use permit, which are outlined in Section 1125.01, Sub 3b: <br /> (1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other <br /> public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. <br /> (7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. <br /> (8) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be <br /> provided. <br /> Adding on to the existing garage would not create a greater impact on existing public <br /> facilities, parks, schools or services, on utilities or access roads, nor would it create an <br /> increase in traffic on adjacent streets. <br /> (2) The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent <br /> • residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and <br /> there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.