08-04-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission July 21, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 6 lighting for the stand would be supplied by the existing lighting, and the conditional use permit would • be recorded with Ramsey County. Ericson stated that the specific requirements pertaining to outdoor sales in this district appear to be addressed satisfactorily, and that there does not appear to be any adverse impacts from this use. He added that there were no problems associated with abutting residential properties. Commissioner Stevenson asked if the stand location shown on the site plmly4klecatedplan within the City's right-of-way or the Highway 10 right-of-way. Ericson«stated that=t*-Mposed stand would be on theapplicant's ro ert , not in the City's easement' r'ea"or the MnDOT>i .ht-of-way. I e the parkinglot was set back 30 feet from the ;1 pert line:>and th t the e'..: as suffict'er t stated that P,.:.::.:p Y .::..::::,�:. .:.:: �:> `� ��:;<:<�>u<:::��, sir' room for the produce stand. Commissioner Stevensoxplaineat, at ontt : x , the location designated for the Mounds View monument typkaktifirAd if they weriii#006a with that project in the future, they probably would not want a`prod stand located on thetack side of the monument marker. Ericson stated that, as the conditic a use=permit was reconsidered on an annual basis, if the Council and Commission's determined h t the< o tand should be eliminated or moved elsewhere, they could bring it back before both bodiett011iPthOgedbodies at that time. 46.11,16k. votReop, Chair Peterson noted a diagonal line in the nortn4>n_ ofe.lot as indicated on the site plan, and requested the clarification of the notation a ::string toigefotlpps,,,44.tOvay area easement. Ericson stated that during the planning of the Holiday Stati9ptotelmMIFilverviewStat Estates planned unit development, one of the requirements;othe development agreement was that the owners dedicate to the City of Mounds View thatular potion at theorth corner of Silver Lake Road and • Highway 10. He stated that it w s on that oe of land 'that the City would, at some time in the future, construct a gateway monu ent. He t t d easement has been filed with the County dedicatingth land to the Cit:::a or fiat ur c i t`a•rtha Peterson stated that it appeared from the site plan, that .;i. .:as appro :a.:e1 „5 feet cloitiiir the highway than the proposed location of the produce stiAgiettson statAiWiliikwas somewhat correct, noting however, that the line was not to scale, and'wift0100te,wouldIT,4Mpipately and25 feet between the stand and the City's easement Nog007 area. .....'....,::;,.... ,;:::><�__;:`k:, } Council ' tuber Stigne f i} the proposed stand would be removed in October. Ralph Durand, the ap.�, ant, stated that* C e. <'eterson requestedlarification regarding the design of the structure. Mr. Durand stated that "r 6 ld be a tempora ..ri<;ent, approximately 12 feet square, tied down on four sides. He stated that 7; •uld be table;;;rider the tent, and a few bushel baskets with produce off to the side. He stated uY would be operating the stand, and he operated such stands within the Big Lake a..,•;:i'40,,otatMat they would be specializing in competitively priced, home grown produce, and that°"e«•'eheved it would be Of benefit to the community. Chair Peterson asked if stakes would be required to sustain this type of a structure, and if so, would they interfere with the underground tanks. Mr. Durand stated that the tanks were not located in the grassy area. He added that the tanks are covered with a one-foot concrete slab. •