08-04-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission July 21, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 9 • Ericson stated that another issue discussed at the prior Planning Commission meeting was the proposed rezoning of the property, and concerns expressed regarding the potential re-uses of the property should the assisted living facility fail or be sold to another developer. He noted the conditional use permit provides that the assisted living facility is the only type of use allowed. He stated that there are other types of"group housing," however, after closer review of the City Code, staff had determined that this could only be permitted in a residential or"home" type:structure. He cited the exact language of the Code which indicates "...group housing, which is onlyallowed if the use is in a family dwelling and be limited to no more than 12 children." 1- ed 1 at the possibility �.�: P Y of the use being altered to some other type of"group housi g would.» Wr if someone were to change the structure itself to a house or dwelling,andthtstaff did no,x<A. ;..114 was feasible r 1 :: likely. .:... or -siowitto Ericson stated that the other possible option would be to pro e some type of multi-family ousing on the site: He explained that if the proposal as presente4110104,could not be re-u'sed for multi- family housing, as it would not meet building or housin$;04,14e stated that if there were a proposal to change this to some type of multi-family dwelling rtments or town-homes, the developer would have to clear the building from the site. :He stateda > ::ugh this could happen, the economic factors would make it veryunlike,,pl: , `ie d:ded that="'"' ��"e setback and parking requirements for multi-family dwellings, probablyv o >,twelve u it "could be constructed at that site. le" ;' t ee Wiliam* Ericson stated that the Code in Section 19.04 Sudivision > is somewhat unclear in its definition of what would be considered a simila r .up housing use. He stated that as the subdivision heading • n ` . fig`` is Nursing Homes, staff could cot d that stttiilar type_sf f group housing would pertain only to elderly group housing. He explained, however,l at because this is not explicitly stated, staff would recommend h t if the Commissiondesired to if ithet` `e of housing to the elderly, the code should be amendeftqcefleet thttelugated that agent be accomplished by amending the first line of Subdivist>::: 109= :4(2) to4 d <h rsing homes and other elderly congregate housing..." which would eliminate '4t stion6t-Ag`".:.:. k:other similar uses would be. WIMP Commissionapplicant had provided the number of staff they would be utilizing at the faces' ity. Ericson state`< e applicant had indicated that the busiest shift would require 8-9 • «.>:.:.;.»»::»>.;..- the ;g: