08-04-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission July 21, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 13 IIIChair Peterson requested that the Commissioners state their views regarding the matter. Commissioner Hegland stated, in regard to rezoning, he was still weighing the idea of whether this was a business or residence, but did not have a strong opinion one way or the other. He stated that he would like to have the parking requirements established, and if that was done, he thought the proposal would be acceptable. He stated that he hadn't heard any resident's objections to this type of use. AP Commissioner Kaden stated that he did not object to this type b ,..dri yp o4� ,'e or th1a �ange. He stated that he was in favor of amending the ordinance to revert Ape original »: the project was withdrawn. He stated that the applicant should resolve t parking issues;°acrete number should be established, particularly in consideration of prevgliting a negative impact imattidiffikfe0tutial area. >::< 4, :> ,<::>...»*, :. Ne Commissioner Laube stated that he felt rezoning with the resat yeause was appropriate, and that the language indicatingelderlycongregate was 'essa` tated that he was a resident housing �. �::::... in this area, and that the proposed idea fit very well with That they=w ' ; 1e;to see at this location. He stated that he was concerned in regard to the •..:>1 ;.nd had manyi e calls from residents expressing their concerns in this regard as well '' Ar , Commissioner Stevenson stated that he concurred With COtimatolter Laube, adding that this was a preliminary stage in the process, and thatshould ge rd they shout for <vvith the conditional zoning at this III time. :.. xw Chair Peterson stated he thougar ht tis was,ow in. eradif ), a g Ud use for the property. He stated that in inion <<�':. was a co eivato eratio``>i thou '"more residential in nature and that he could his op � � �� p g not think a c.that wo l = 'l e a ro r ; f `r this site. He stated that he believed this would pp p .•: >; 3` :_.=:rco' r ial uses addingthat the majorityof the traffic would be be a love*04g4se than ca ptie e c r ""T' tail t `:'' _.-. . .on might have customers comingin and out all daylong. for visitors, � :�� :� YP ' j�s� � :A<a g idea toproceed with the zoningand the conditional use He stated that 1z"""' �pE �?, it was` :. permit, and tka l i :'on of the*'* king issues was required. www the ing issues, she w ul'dw 'e i ! ' n favor of it. ' 'ssioner Johnsonated that he was completely against the project, and not in favor of"down- 17 . �o: A9' P Y g p j ,, 0: in He stated tJ at if he was a business owner, with a business located next to the subject 400- ttl;i.::: ::. A d had intended to see other businesses locate in that area, he would be very upset. He st'9`t `'a`t>: <ad`dition to this they did not have enough information regarding the issues. Commissioner Berke stated that he would have to be satisfied-with the parking prior to moving forward, and that he would require clarification regarding what type of usage would be applied to the facility. He stated that the matter was still too vague, and needed clarification regarding the staff requirements. He stated that if he were satisfied with the outcome of these matters, he would be in favor of the proposal.