08-18-1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission June 16, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 11 • of parking as proposed,there would be ten parking spaces for visitors. He stated that this exceeds the City Code parking requirements, which are one space for every three beds. He stated the question at hand is whether or not this amount of parking is adequate. He stated the applicant has indicated there is room to provide additional parking, and if, at some point in the future it was determined that 22 spaces were not adequate,they could show proof of additional parking on the site plaricson noted that there were some time constraints to be considered in regard to this proal. esnquired if there was sufficient consensus among the Commissioners to direct staff to brito'e them a resolution recommending approval or denial to the City Council at the:=gin t meetin'g,j >$ A;..d.. «. , ;. Commissioner Kaden inquired regarding an amendment writhe Code to c1arifythetypo„uset>'t e facility as "Nursing homes or other elderly congregate h ng, Aa .d'if this could=be a of plashed � in conjunction with their recommendation to the City to Ericson stated that l>in addition to recommending the approval of the rezoning request, they'vastirtgkpa recommendation to amend the City Code to clarify the allowed use, in terms of assisted<l'i r > rsing homes, or other types of group living. He stated this could be done at the sari e'time, h eVe as two separate actions: Kaden stated that he would like to see«>t is::,lan ua e'itt Commissioner .., Iter Commissioner Hegland inquired regarding the rogress flee tic flow,tssue at the facility. Ericson stated,at this time,he was not aware of any agreements;betwee ad Hacent property owners and the applicant for joint access,however, there were option"to apt is matter, as well as the median on County Road I, at the time of thesteplan review. _> AMP Mr. Pinkerton stated, at this tin €5uperA erica is nol interested in agreeing to a joint access. Commissioner Laube clarified.,tli the applicant' d previously indicated that they would consider an entrance `l y. on Mounds `Le .Drive with: he:exit on CountyRoad I. Mr. Pinkerton stated he 4ffitemvq040 thought:'`;.is would be a g o i ,,Acting Chair Stevenson inquired if they would then keep the median. IV : rton statedt<> el <median could stay as it is, with a right out only exit. Acting Chair Stevensona ; ' d that is parking issues could also be addressed on the site plan review. He stated .. ".: . 1�� bmrrtls� �, fluid require the additional parking spaces be classified as possible overflow kin_,and w ul cessarily have to designate them as additional parking at this time. Ericson stated this was citzt • lig Chair Stevensontated that the zoning change was the preliminary step, and would have to r €.sit that the prop,"reverts to its original zoning if the proposal does not go forward. Ericson <s.. " i t after researching this matter, staff determined this technically could not be accomplished ;pre � :: . :t= dicated. He explained that the resolution could state "if the project does not go fo:;<9J4 oning would take place,” however, some action would be required of the Council in order to reinstate the original zoning of the property: He stated that the property owner had indicated he was agreeable to this. Acting Chair Stevenson stated that a statement to this effect should be included in the resolution. Commissioner Hegland inquired if the property owner could also be requested to provide his signature indicating his acceptance of this procedure. Ericson stated that this • could be requested.