Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 16, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 20 <br /> • <br /> Council Member Stigney inquired regarding the proposal's infringement upon the wetland buffer. Mr. <br /> Peterson referred to the site plan, which indicated it was substantially within the 100-foot buffer. He <br /> stated that he could provide many examples of similar development, which have been allowed in this <br /> buffer,as approved by the Planning Commission and City Council on many occasions.Acting Chair <br /> Stevenson stated that the factors of this proposal are different, explaining that welds have been <br /> developed and mitigated, however, the signing off of City easements has n t beet a commonplace <br /> occurrence. ''°'::. V <br /> Actingin Chair Stevenson closedth floor for public <br /> input 11 <br /> 55 <br /> p.m. <br /> ynffzj::r T<. <br /> Commissioner Kaden stated, originally,Mrs. Haselius signaAhe do. ent indicaf ` ` t: A were <br /> permanent easements, and, in light of this, he assumed that:< t he and the developef.., re of the <br /> understanding that the lots could never be developed by ane, inquired if this was an official <br /> document. Mr.Peterson stated that there was no question: atryelius signed this document, <br /> however,it is also true that it is not uncommon for permaifint eases 1 t e vacated. He stated the <br /> City has the right to vacate a permanent easement. He:;ttat d, at the ti the .;,a.sements were granted, <br /> and under those conditions, it was viewed to 1.)4fit a <m perpetuityy< e stated that has since <br /> changed. He reiterated that the vacation of easements Themeriftgoogituncornatin process. <br /> Aar 4"101,119&A,00:' <br /> r^ €1,11:&:: ><.:< <br /> Acting Chair Stevenson inquired if staff rerequired a res iiutiorr`r tnding to the Council that they <br /> approve or deny the vacation of the eas mnents. E`icson stated that their recommendation could be <br /> put forward in that manner, how r, it w4ifigt requireti and the Planning Commission could III <br /> indicate their position by motion*" °`>i <br /> � :.. yam <br /> aii Lti <br /> 6000%10 INOW,V4g.: <br /> Acting Chvenson inquiredH`egardingt hCommissioners opinions on the matter, and asked <br /> if theyv re dtt it e.cit:: ci"that <br /> men .Counthey not vacate the drainage easements on those <br /> two lots. :s' E1.000. <br /> . :f kx t... ;... <br /> MOTION/SECOND en/MillerxttRecommend to the City Council they Not Vacate the <br /> DrainageTtility erne ts`on Lots 17 and 18, Edgewood Square (Pinewood Circle). <br /> A:.7Z,OarNays—0 The motion carried. <br /> two <br /> Ate <br /> <` Special Plant ng Case No. SP-071-99 <br /> ate . t�;::�`�"�>proposed ordinances amending Chapter 1008 of the Mounds View Municipal Code <br /> peva .g'°. .* Billboards and amending the Code pertaining to signage in the PF and CRP zoning <br /> districts. <br /> • <br />