My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-1999
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
08-18-1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 10:57:44 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 10:57:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/18/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission June 16, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 22 - <br /> 411 <br /> stated that it relates to all existing signs within the City that are technically not in conformance with <br /> the ordinance. <br /> Commissioner Kaden inquired if Ramsey County were to allow people to place advertising signs at <br /> this location,would this be permitted under the ordinance. Jopke stated that he did ebelieve they <br /> could,but reiterated if it was the desire of the Commission to include morei$limiti` :g'language to the <br /> code amendment, it could be done. <br /> <Ff.* <br /> hi :h tothe <br /> ��}'<"h�^ e w iz �<`:`",telqty. <br /> Commissioner Laube stated that they could indicate that<��g ag �h:p .,, � ` <br /> Commissioner Kaden stated that he did not think this was necessary ,He stated,;f`y� ns.ey.ci pnty <br /> desired to erect a sin such as park identification, he would :e agree able to that, 'owe :t r, �:i`nitely <br /> not advertising. Acting Chair Stevenson stated that thelanguage should refer to' l f"the non- <br /> conforming signs of this type. He inquired if this might befog<lim ting, and result in having to be <br /> more specific with all other types of non-conforming sign siNghittlitat§kkhe did not believe so. He <br /> stated what they were attempting to do with this particular'ttdinancEst .ne what are appropriate <br /> signs in these two specific districts. He stated he thought they couldiutf t l pecific requirements in <br /> the use regulations. He suggested they include,;l u ; ':i the end of>-04 subdivision, to indicate <br /> "the signs shall identify and relate to the activity, whicxkk sykin:te ded uponthe site. <br /> r <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Laube/Berke. To A Ative Resp tion N t99, a Resoluti nRe <br /> commen <br /> in <br /> g <br /> Approval of Ordinance No. 637; as Amended to Include the language Following Each Subdivision <br /> to Indicate the Signs Shall Identify and Relate t the Activity Which is Intended upon the Site, an <br /> Ordinance Amending the Chapter `S of the Minds Vie r Municipal Code Pertaining to Permitted <br /> Signage in PF Public Facilities and CRP ConservancyRecreation, Preservation Zoning Districts; <br /> SP073. :� <br /> Planning :< :<: o. 101 <br /> `..k u: ..:,,_. Ayes= Y a*:. Nays—0 The motion carried. <br /> w4Atilve"f% y.Ui�StYt9 Staff Regori :ms > i <br /> of Infp ation <br /> Previou .ound l ction <br /> tamp <br /> Co a .."unity Development Developmentpirdttor Jopke reported on City Council action from their meeting on July <br /> 2 e stated there w ' approval of the oversized garage at 8059 Red Oak Drive. He stated the <br /> <('C< <br /> 1 approved the conditional use permit for Thrifty Car Rental located at 2975 Highway 10, with <br /> Hes,_tathe applicant would come before the Council and request reconsideration of <br /> 0/7 <br /> to truck,trailer and recreation vehicle rentals. <br /> • <br /> Jopke stated there was approval of the conditional use permit for the outdoor produce stand at the <br /> ,Holiday Stationstore. He stated neighboring residents appeared at the meeting and indicated their <br /> concerns in regard to existing noise problems with the station, and the property owner was currently <br /> working with the residents to resolve these issues. He stated they had the second reading and approval <br /> of the ordinance pertaining to the permitted uses within the B-2 Limited Business District, which • <br /> relates to educational and instructional facilities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.